Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015 IEEE Radar Conference 2015
DOI: 10.1109/radarconf.2015.7411894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of multiband monostatic and bistatic radar signatures of wind turbines

Abstract: This paper presents the results of recent measurements taken with two radar systems to measure the simultaneous monostatic and bistatic signature of wind turbines, at S-band and X-band. Coherent monostatic and bistatic data was collected with the University College London (UCL) NetRAD 2.4 GHz radar, and the Cranfield University CW radar operating at X-band. This initial analysis shows the bistatic Doppler signature of wind turbines and informs on the key differences seen at modest bistatic angles. Polarimetric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These systems have been mentioned as a possible mitigation approach for wind farm clutter, as multiple views on the area under surveillance as well as different deployment geometries can be beneficial to reduce the adverse clutter effects. In our previous work in [10,11] preliminary results were presented in terms of micro-Doppler signatures of wind turbines extracted from bistatic radar data, with limited bistatic angle of approximately 6.5°.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems have been mentioned as a possible mitigation approach for wind farm clutter, as multiple views on the area under surveillance as well as different deployment geometries can be beneficial to reduce the adverse clutter effects. In our previous work in [10,11] preliminary results were presented in terms of micro-Doppler signatures of wind turbines extracted from bistatic radar data, with limited bistatic angle of approximately 6.5°.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower frequencies also exhibits intense level of power as predicted. In the experimental micro-Doppler, the trace of the tip present in the theoretical signature, can also be seen above the experimental results such as those in [12] and [17], as they are focused on monostatic and bistatic measurements in the far-field whereas our results focus on monostatic measurements in the nearfield. However, some comments could be made on qualitative aspects of the results obtained here.…”
Section: B Results For Flat Bladesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The turbine is a 7 MW Samsung model, with rotor diameter equal to 171.2 m, height of the hub 110.6 m and length of each of the 3 blades equal to approximately 85.6 m. The turbine is designed to operate with wind speed between 3.5 and 25 m/s, generating rotation speed of approximately 5.9 to 10.6 rpm, according to the information supplied by ORE-C, who maintains this turbine. It is important to notice that this model of turbine, designed for an offshore usage, is much larger than the onshore variants whose radar signatures were measured in previous work [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Groundtruth data from ORE-C (rotation velocity and yaw angle of the turbine over time) will allow correlating the passive and active radar signatures with the actual behavior of the turbine, enabling a step forward compared to previous work where this data was not made available by the wind farm management [10][11].…”
Section: B Modeling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an effect of this, the development of wind farmswhich is a priority to reduce reliance on fossil fuels -can be hindered by "radar objections" from defense or civil aviation authorities. Research within the radar community has been undertaken to characterize the radar signatures of wind turbine and farms, both from a modelling perspective [2][3][4][5] and from an experimental standpoint [6][7][8][9][10][11], as well as looking at improving signal processing and detection algorithms to make existing radar systems more resilient to wind farm clutter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation