2009
DOI: 10.1080/00268970903160597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of multi-configuration density functional theory methods: theory and model application to bond-breaking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…47,48 While WFT-in-DFT methods aim at a multiscale description of large systems, MC-PDFT as well as sr-DFT-lr-WFT methods pursue similar objectives as DFT/MRCI. In the beginning, the combinations of generalized valence bond theory in perfect-pairing approximation 57,58 or minimal CASSCF or CASCI with DFT [59][60][61][62][63][64] were mostly thought to provide a proper description of bond dissociation processes in the electronic ground state. Later approaches used larger active spaces and additionally addressed electronically excited states [65][66][67][68][69] or strived for correcting the long-range behavior of TDDFT in describing CT states.…”
Section: Alternative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,48 While WFT-in-DFT methods aim at a multiscale description of large systems, MC-PDFT as well as sr-DFT-lr-WFT methods pursue similar objectives as DFT/MRCI. In the beginning, the combinations of generalized valence bond theory in perfect-pairing approximation 57,58 or minimal CASSCF or CASCI with DFT [59][60][61][62][63][64] were mostly thought to provide a proper description of bond dissociation processes in the electronic ground state. Later approaches used larger active spaces and additionally addressed electronically excited states [65][66][67][68][69] or strived for correcting the long-range behavior of TDDFT in describing CT states.…”
Section: Alternative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of a density functional theory including nondynamic (or "strong") electron correlation -which Becke designated as the "last frontier" in DFT [97] -has been pursued by many groups following different approaches. Among these approaches, we may cite the use of restricted open-shell ground-state representations [98], configuration ensembles with fractional occupations [91,[99][100][101], configuration interaction [102,103], multiconfigurational DFT [104], hybrid multiconfiguration/(TD)DFT [105,106], and spin-unrestricted broken-symmetry (UBS) [107] approaches. Unfortunately, analytical energy gradients are not available for most of these methods, which rules out their use in surface hopping dynamics.…”
Section: Critical Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key‐idea of Dieter Cremer's CAS‐DFT approach was to treat the exchange part exactly at the CAS‐SCF level, while including dynamic correlation via a DFT correlation functional, as originally suggested by Miehlich, Stoll, and Savin) and implemented for GVB‐LSD by Elfi Kraka . Dieter Cremer and Jüergen Gräfenstein developed a CAS‐DFT program that allows an economic treatment of static and dynamic correlation effects in molecules with multi‐reference character and that master the basic CAS‐DFT problems: It avoids a double‐counting of correlation effects (a key problem in multi‐reference DFT), uses a two‐body rather than a one‐body correlation functional, is size‐consistent and free of any self‐interaction errors, and adjusts the correlation part to a changing active space . This approach has inspired the multi‐reference DFT developer community over the past decade …”
Section: Post‐scf Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%