Analysis of Mobile Diesel Generator Operation to cope with Extended Loss of all AC Power in Nuclear Power Plant

Park, Ji-Kyung; Lee, Jae-Do; Jang, Hong-Seok; Park, Hyun-Shin

doi:10.1109/upec.2018.8542064

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The operators who work in Task Type III can use AOPs, EOPs, and SAMGs. Especially, based on NEI 12-06 (NEI, 2012) or the multi-barrier accident coping strategy (MACST) (i.e., Korean version of FLEX) (Park & et al, 2018), FLEX support guidelines (FSGs) or MACST operating procedures (MOPs) are also considered for providing pre-planned strategies and accomplishing specific tasks, e.g., the use of mobile equipment, to support the functions of the EOPs and AOPs.…”

Section: Human Task Typesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk-Informed Analysis for an Enhanced Resilient PWR with ATF, FLEX, and Passive Cooling

Parisi

Davis

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report documents the activities performed by Idaho National Laboratory (INL) during the fiscal year (FY) 2019 for the DOE Light Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) Program, Risk-Informed System Analysis (RISA) Pathway, Enhanced Resilient Plant (ERP) Systems research. The purpose of the RISA Pathway research and development is to support plant owner-operator decisions with the aim to improve the economics, reliability, and maintain the high levels of safety of current nuclear power plants over periods of extended plant operations. The concept of ERP refers to the combinations of Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF), optimal use of Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategy (FLEX), enhancements to plant components and systems, and the incorporation of augmented or new passive cooling systems, as well as improved fuel cycle efficiency. The objective of the ERP research effort is to use the RISA methods and toolkit in industry applications, including methods development and early demonstration of technologies, in order to enhance existing reactors' safety features (both active and passive) and to substantially reduce operating costs through risk-informed approaches to plant design modifications to the plant and their characterization. iv Table ES-1. Time to Core Damage Comparison for LOFW Scenarios with ATF Designs. Scenario Description Time to Core Damage (hr:min) Zircaloy FeCrAl Δt (FeCrAl) Chromite Δt (Chromite)

show abstract

Section: Human Task Typesmentioning

confidence: 99%