1998
DOI: 10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700040019x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Metal‐EDTA Complexes by Electrospray Mass Spectrometry

Abstract: Solutions of the strong complexing agent ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and Cu, Pb, Cd, AI, and Fe(III) were examined electrospray mass spectrometry (ES/MS). Uncomplexed EDTA and metaI-EDTA complexes survive the electrospray process intact and can be detected simultaneously by mass spectrometry. Best sensitivity was achieved in the positive ion mode in which EDTA and EDTAmetal complexes (present in solution as anions) were detected protonated species with a single positive charge. Except for the proton… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From comparisons of the LODs, sensitivities, formation constants of complexes (data not presented in this review), and from a consideration of the advantages in separation by size-exclusion chromatography, as outlined in the next section (i.e., the ligand with highest molecular weight was preferred), CyDTA was selected as being the best chelating agent for our purposes. These LODs are one to two orders smaller than those reported earlier for the detection of metal-EDTA complexes using ESI-MS, [16][17][18] or are comparable to those obtained in positive ion mode using cationic ion-pairing reagents with a metal-APC complex 19 . These values are almost the same, or slightly lower than, those for direct elemental measurement by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), although they are still three orders of magnitude larger than those of ICP-MS.…”
Section: ·1 Detection Of Metal-apc Complexessupporting
confidence: 48%
“…From comparisons of the LODs, sensitivities, formation constants of complexes (data not presented in this review), and from a consideration of the advantages in separation by size-exclusion chromatography, as outlined in the next section (i.e., the ligand with highest molecular weight was preferred), CyDTA was selected as being the best chelating agent for our purposes. These LODs are one to two orders smaller than those reported earlier for the detection of metal-EDTA complexes using ESI-MS, [16][17][18] or are comparable to those obtained in positive ion mode using cationic ion-pairing reagents with a metal-APC complex 19 . These values are almost the same, or slightly lower than, those for direct elemental measurement by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), although they are still three orders of magnitude larger than those of ICP-MS.…”
Section: ·1 Detection Of Metal-apc Complexessupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Refer to the cited studies (e.g., Combariza & Vachet (2003)) for a complete discussion. Other less common applications were the kinetic study of the complexation reaction (Boukhalfa & Crumbliss, 2000;Combariza & Vachet, 2002), and the determination of the concentration of metal ions in solution through complexation with a suitable ligand (or, vice versa, the determination of the concentration of a ligand through complexation with a suitable metal ion) (Baron & Hering, 1998;Satterfield & Brodbelt, 2000) (see also above, the auxiliary ligand strategy).…”
Section: Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, a system containing aluminum and several anions other than Cl − in solution is examined. Studies of solutions containing Al 3+ and chelating agents [11] (anions), such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), [12,13] by ESI-MS have been reported and some of them indicate the applicability of ESI-MS to the study of aluminum-ligand solution equilibria. [14,15] However, the coordination of such ligands with Al 3+ is too strong to allow the discussion of the possibility of chemical modification such as fragmentation in a mass spectrometer (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%