2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.02.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of membrane pore blocking models applied to the ultrafiltration of PEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
93
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
93
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As observed earlier, the microscopic image of the feed shows a significant amount of char particles greater than 1 µm in size. Similar results were presented by Vela et al [19] in the ultrafiltration of PEG through monotubular ceramic membranes. …”
Section: Figure17supporting
confidence: 89%
“…As observed earlier, the microscopic image of the feed shows a significant amount of char particles greater than 1 µm in size. Similar results were presented by Vela et al [19] in the ultrafiltration of PEG through monotubular ceramic membranes. …”
Section: Figure17supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Values for the parameter n, depending on the type of fouling, are the following (figure 1): complete pore blocking (n = 2), partial pore blocking (n = 1), internal pore blocking (n = 3/2) and gel layer formation (n = 0). The constant k depends on the transmembrane pressure, the dynamic permeate viscosity and the blocked areas per unit of permeate flux and the membrane resistance, R m [26]. The parameters considered by these models have a physical meaning and contribute to the comprehension of the mechanisms involved in membrane fouling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the above unified fouling model, four classical fouling models can be derived for different values of the fouling parameter n. The four models are cake filtration (n = 0), intermediate blocking (n = 1), internal blocking (n = 3/2) and the complete blocking model (n = 2). By integration of (5), we obtain the differential equation for the permeate flux [16,17], which is expressed as:…”
Section: Membrane Foulingmentioning
confidence: 99%