2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.10.22.21265361
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Mechanistic Pathways in the Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Evidence from a Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Background and Aims: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the most common cause of liver disease contributing to significant disease burden worldwide. However, there is lack of comparison of efficacy between different NASH drug classes. We conducted a network meta-analysis evaluating drug classes through comparing histological outcomes and targets of drugs. Approach & Results: Medline, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched for articles evaluating NASH drugs in biopsy-proven NASH patients. Primary outcomes … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was a post hoc analysis of a previous data set examining the outcomes of NASH in clinical trials. [ 14 ] This meta‐analysis was conducted with reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses statement. [ 15,16 ] A comprehensive search was conducted on Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with assistance from a medical librarian on NASH RCTs since inception on October 1, 2021.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was a post hoc analysis of a previous data set examining the outcomes of NASH in clinical trials. [ 14 ] This meta‐analysis was conducted with reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses statement. [ 15,16 ] A comprehensive search was conducted on Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with assistance from a medical librarian on NASH RCTs since inception on October 1, 2021.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a post hoc analysis of a previous data set examining the outcomes of NASH in clinical trials. [14] This meta-analysis was conducted with reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. [15,16]…”
Section: Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%