2019
DOI: 10.2144/fsoa-2019-0070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of management decisions and outcomes of a weekly multidisciplinary pediatric tumor board meeting in Uganda

Abstract: Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of a pediatric multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) in Uganda. Patients & methods: We documented the discussion of cases presented at a pediatric MTB and subsequently, though retrospective chart review, determined the degree to which decision were implemented. Results: 95 patients were discussed. In total, 129 of 226 (57%) distinct management decisions reached during the MTBs were implemented. Of these, 15 resulted in changes in diagnosis and 53 were classified as major changes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[72][73][74][75] Establishing a multidisciplinary team discussion or tumor board is a cornerstone of building capacity for pediatric oncology care. [72][73][74][75] One of the key limitations identified by the panel was a paucity of evidence to address the selected questions. When evidence exists, it is frequently of low certainty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[72][73][74][75] Establishing a multidisciplinary team discussion or tumor board is a cornerstone of building capacity for pediatric oncology care. [72][73][74][75] One of the key limitations identified by the panel was a paucity of evidence to address the selected questions. When evidence exists, it is frequently of low certainty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,71 In addition, a multidisciplinary childhood cancer team incorporating radiologists, pathologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, and surgical specialists who discuss the case prior to any surgical intervention is essential to ensure high quality of care. [72][73][74][75] Establishing a multidisciplinary team discussion or tumor board is a cornerstone of building capacity for pediatric oncology care. [72][73][74][75] One of the key limitations identified by the panel was a paucity of evidence to address the selected questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several other sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries have implemented TBMs both in person and, recently, online [19]. While most TBMs in SSA are general in nature, there is a trend towards site-specific and speciality-specific TBMs [19,20]. However, some cancer centres in LMICs lack the necessary resources to organise TBMs; this is especially true in sub-Saharan Africa where there is a lack of multidisciplinary support from oncology specialists, oncology surgeons, pathologists and other key personnel as well as a lack of protected time for clinicians to attend TBMs [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, while availability of each of these elements may vary between centers, this does not preclude delivery of effective curative treatment for pediatric tumors when available resources can be appropriately channeled 18,19 . This underscores the importance of the multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) as a critical element for advancing pediatric solid tumor care, and one that remains relevant even in LMICs [20][21][22] . However, organizing MDTBs can be an organizational burden and amounts to extra workload for the involved personnel 23,24 , especially in centers with already-limited resources.…”
Section: Abstract 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%