2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8655(02)00221-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of mammogram classification using a wavelet transform decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t Gabor Filter [20], Zernike Moments [21] and Wavelet Transform [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] are more popular than the others. In the classification as a final stage, suspicious regions are classified to two groups of benign or malign lesions.…”
Section: Page 4 Of 41mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t Gabor Filter [20], Zernike Moments [21] and Wavelet Transform [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] are more popular than the others. In the classification as a final stage, suspicious regions are classified to two groups of benign or malign lesions.…”
Section: Page 4 Of 41mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are usually composed of a wide range of combination of fuzzy logic, wavelet transformation or that of the neural network [2][3][4][5][6]. Since the mammograms show larger areas of varying contrast and brightness, thus the information is highly susceptible to being correlated [7][8][9][10]. Other researchers used wavelet transformation to an extent where it tends to give more consolidated results than the other methods [11,12]; therefore, the following study presents an effectively modeled algorithm for multi-wavelet transformation to denoise the noisy mammographic images to allow easy microclassification to help doctors or radiologist detect breast cancer easily.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers relied on different ways, wavelet transform is mostly used because of its efficient properties especially the De-Correlation property of components of image with the high and low frequency content (Übeyl & Inan, 2004) (Agnew et al, 2011) (Florian & Thierry, 2007) (Akhilesh, 2012). Some researchers used discrete wavelet transform (DWT) (Fodor & Kamath, 2003) (Ferreira & Borges, 2003) in ultrasound images. The DWT is very efficient from a computational point of view, but it has main disadvantages that it is shift variant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%