2005
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2005.856934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Low-Density Parity-Check Codes for the Gilbert–Elliott Channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…FSMC models enable implementation of mathematically tractable channel estimation and data decoding algorithms for time-varying fading channels [35], [37]. Decoding algorithms for conventional turbo codes and low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes have been modified in [30], [31], and [32], respectively, to take into account FSMC state estimation, and it is shown that information rates higher than the memoryless channel capacity become possible. More recently, successive decoding is proposed for fading channels modeled by FSMCs that takes channel memory into account [33].…”
Section: Historical Background On Applications Of Fsmc Models For Fadmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FSMC models enable implementation of mathematically tractable channel estimation and data decoding algorithms for time-varying fading channels [35], [37]. Decoding algorithms for conventional turbo codes and low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes have been modified in [30], [31], and [32], respectively, to take into account FSMC state estimation, and it is shown that information rates higher than the memoryless channel capacity become possible. More recently, successive decoding is proposed for fading channels modeled by FSMCs that takes channel memory into account [33].…”
Section: Historical Background On Applications Of Fsmc Models For Fadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating the GEC and FSMC model into the message passing in LDPC decoding has been studied in [34] and [31], respectively and superior error rate performance compared to decoding techniques that do not take channel statistics into account is shown. In [32], density evolution analysis is extended from memoryless channels to the GEC, which can be used to determine the region of GEC parameters over which LDPC decoding is successful.…”
Section: Proposed Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Lemma 4: Let C be an (n, M, d) binary linear quasi-perfect code to be used over the Markov noise channel. Assume that…”
Section: Decoding Of Quasi-perfect Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In light of the above result and Lemma 2, we next propose the following complete decoder that improves over MD decoding. It includes SMD decoding and exploits 2 Recall that the ML and MD decoders are complete decoders -i.e., they always select a codeword to decode the received word -while the SML and SMD decoders are incomplete decoders as they declare a decoding failure when there are more than one codeword with minimal decoding metric. 3 In contrast, recall that for the BSC(p) with p < 1/2, SML and SMD decoding are equivalent for all binary codes (the same equivalence also holds between ML and MD decoding).…”
Section: Decoding Of Quasi-perfect Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation