1980
DOI: 10.1016/0301-4622(80)80032-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of low angle light scattering results from T7 DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
26
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
10
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2,7 However other studies suggest that excluded volume interactions indeed have an impact at similar contour lengths. 810 Further confounding the issue, the oft-cited measurements of the diffusion coefficient of concatamers of λ-DNA by Smith et al 11 suggested that dsDNA had already reached a universal limit. However, the work by Smith et al is at odds with recent theoretical work on the draining behavior of wormlike polymer coils 12 and work on DNA in confinement 13 which suggests that the molecular weight required to reach the universal limit for dynamic properties is even larger than the weight required for static properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,7 However other studies suggest that excluded volume interactions indeed have an impact at similar contour lengths. 810 Further confounding the issue, the oft-cited measurements of the diffusion coefficient of concatamers of λ-DNA by Smith et al 11 suggested that dsDNA had already reached a universal limit. However, the work by Smith et al is at odds with recent theoretical work on the draining behavior of wormlike polymer coils 12 and work on DNA in confinement 13 which suggests that the molecular weight required to reach the universal limit for dynamic properties is even larger than the weight required for static properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While none of these studies present a direct measurement of coil structure in solution, even static light scattering (SLS) experiments that do measure the structure factor of solutions, reveal a significant 30-40% expansion of 14 m DNA chains [15,16] far exceeding theoretical estimations ($ 4%) [17,18]. A known issue in SLS studies is the very poor scattering by DNA, that requires extrapolation procedures from higher concentrations to measure DNA structure in dilute solutions [16]. SLS is also sensitive to scattering by dust particles, that are not (5) 058102-1 Ó 2013 American Physical Society trivial to remove because of the closeness of their sizes to those of DNA molecules [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, a variety of experimental results actually contradict it: the diffusion coefficient of DNA coils of lengths 2:6 < L < 130 m [12], the segment distribution of DNA of lengths 15 < L < 60 m tethered to a substrate [13], AFM measurements of DNA end-to-end distance distribution for 0:5 < L < 15 m [14]-all reveal the scaling R g / L 0:57-0:59 indicating strong excluded volume interactions. While none of these studies present a direct measurement of coil structure in solution, even static light scattering (SLS) experiments that do measure the structure factor of solutions, reveal a significant 30-40% expansion of 14 m DNA chains [15,16] far exceeding theoretical estimations ($ 4%) [17,18]. A known issue in SLS studies is the very poor scattering by DNA, that requires extrapolation procedures from higher concentrations to measure DNA structure in dilute solutions [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The light-scattering method can be applied in a stationary-state mode (Harpst, 1980;Lemaire et al, 1984Lemaire et al, , 1987 or as a function of time (Denk and Schnabel, 1982). The method is more convenient when the scattered light is measured at an angle of 90" to the incident light beam than at a very small angle of 2-7".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%