1991
DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300030007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of lines of mice selected on fat content: 4. Correlated responses in growth and reproduction

Abstract: Lines of mice have been selected for 32 generations for either high or low fat content, resulting in a threefold divergence in the selection criterion (estimated fat content of males at 14 weeks of age). Male mice from both lines were dissected at a series of ages between 4 and 26 weeks and the following traits measured or estimated: body weight, fat content, lean weight, and the weights of several fatpads and internal organs. The lines appeared to have a similar underlying lean weight upon which the Fat line … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may have arisen as a result of a repartition of growth away from lean and into fat. The similar magnitude of main effects and interactions on both body weight and lean mass are in agreement with previous analyses showing that the two traits had high phenotypic and genetic correlations (both over 0-9, Beniwal et al 1992*) and that the amount of fat in the carcass could be genetically altered with little effect on the underlying lean mass (Hastings et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This may have arisen as a result of a repartition of growth away from lean and into fat. The similar magnitude of main effects and interactions on both body weight and lean mass are in agreement with previous analyses showing that the two traits had high phenotypic and genetic correlations (both over 0-9, Beniwal et al 1992*) and that the amount of fat in the carcass could be genetically altered with little effect on the underlying lean mass (Hastings et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…(1984). In contrast, responses in the F lines, selected from the same base for fatness, have shown little change in reproductive performance (Brien et al, 1984;Hastings et a!., 1991), confirming that responses were associated with body weight change. The correlated responses were very small after about generation 25, however.…”
Section: Generationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…After 40 generations of relaxed selection, the lines differed in total body fat percentage by about 5%, or two-fold, at 10 weeks of age (F 10.8%, L 5.5%; predicted from dry matter content, data not shown). Results are not available at later ages on the relaxed lines, but after 10 weeks of age, aggregation of fat is continuous in the F but negligible in the L selected lines [15]. Therefore this 5% divergence is likely to increase in absolute terms with age, suggesting there was little regression in total body fat proportion over the period of relaxed selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%