2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-010-1779-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of licking microstructure provides no evidence for a reduction in reward value following acute or sub-chronic phencyclidine administration

Abstract: Following acute PCP treatment, we found no evidence of reduced reward value without the presence of confounding motor deficits. Sub-chronic PCP withdrawal also produced no decrease in reward value. Therefore, the current results indicate that neither acute PCP treatment nor sub-chronic PCP withdrawal produce consummatory anhedonia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…23,36,53,56,70); changes seen occasionally in this parameter are rarely of the magnitude seen here and typically occur with drugs that produce overt motor disturbances (e.g., Refs. 19,20,34), which were not observed in this study with Ex4. That the ILI was affected to such a notable degree by Ex4 suggests that GLP-1-receptor activation might directly or indirectly act on premotor or motoneurons in the brain stem that control oromotor function (see Refs.…”
Section: The Effects Of Glp-1-receptor Modulation On Responsiveness Tcontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…23,36,53,56,70); changes seen occasionally in this parameter are rarely of the magnitude seen here and typically occur with drugs that produce overt motor disturbances (e.g., Refs. 19,20,34), which were not observed in this study with Ex4. That the ILI was affected to such a notable degree by Ex4 suggests that GLP-1-receptor activation might directly or indirectly act on premotor or motoneurons in the brain stem that control oromotor function (see Refs.…”
Section: The Effects Of Glp-1-receptor Modulation On Responsiveness Tcontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Recently, Lydall and colleagues showed that sub-chronic treatment with PCP does not reduce the value of a reward which is of high value for rats (sucrose) (Lydall et al, 2010). They conclude (as do we, reviewed in Neill et al 2014) that scPCP does not induce anhedonia per se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We have demonstrated that these deficits are reversed by several novel targets and low doses of atypical antipsychotics (Grayson et al 2015, Neill et al 2010, 2014. When it comes to investigating negative symptoms, we and others have shown that sc PCP induces social withdrawal but not anhedonia in rodents (Lydall et al, 2010;Neill et al, 2014) with the growing consensus that anhedonia per se. is not a feature of negative symptoms (Barnes et al, 2014a;Foussias et al, 2014) lending further support for the validity of this model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It has been suggested that assays of licking microstructure can reveal changes in reward. However, this is not always the case, as neuroleptic drugs, such as PCP, cause anhedonia in humans, but do not change lick microstructure during sucrose intake in animals, at doses that do not cause motor impairment 30 . The design of our choice assay is based on the neuroeconomic principle that, if animals choose between two options that require the same of work, the option chosen provides a measure of the value of that option 9,31,32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%