1985
DOI: 10.2514/3.9059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of large vortical structures in shear layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But this cause the mixing layer to be destabilized and the vorticity thickness grows again due to the increased amplification rates at further downstream locations. Similar observations were reported by McInville et al 54 and Stanley and Sarkar 41 ; (4) for the same reason, the contraction or expansion of the mean flow will make the fluctuating part to gain energy from or loose energy to the mean sheared flow. This will exhibit as alternating positive and negative Reynolds stress reported by Stanley and Sarkar, 41 but they are not shown here for brevity.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Fluctuationssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…But this cause the mixing layer to be destabilized and the vorticity thickness grows again due to the increased amplification rates at further downstream locations. Similar observations were reported by McInville et al 54 and Stanley and Sarkar 41 ; (4) for the same reason, the contraction or expansion of the mean flow will make the fluctuating part to gain energy from or loose energy to the mean sheared flow. This will exhibit as alternating positive and negative Reynolds stress reported by Stanley and Sarkar, 41 but they are not shown here for brevity.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Fluctuationssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The reverse transfer in momentum maybe due to presence of pressure gradient as explained above or maybe due to the nature of initial disturbances. If disturbances are present, it has been found (McInville et al, 1985) that the phase angle between the forcing wave and the initial response wave greatly affects the shear layer structure. Depending on this angle, merging of vortex structures to form larger vortices can be inhibited and even totally eliminated resulting in the collapse of the shear layer growth.…”
Section: Shear Laver Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%