2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-021-02029-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of large deflection of nanobeams based on the modified couple stress theory by using finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Abouelregal and Marin [12] used the MCST to develop the Euler-Bernoulli beam model for the investigation of the temperature-dependent properties within the nanobeam. All those research works [9][10][11][12] confirmed the capability of the MCST to represent the small-scale effect in the nanostructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Abouelregal and Marin [12] used the MCST to develop the Euler-Bernoulli beam model for the investigation of the temperature-dependent properties within the nanobeam. All those research works [9][10][11][12] confirmed the capability of the MCST to represent the small-scale effect in the nanostructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The MCST is one of these theories that has become popular in the last two decades to address the small-scale effect inherent in micro-and nanoscale structures. For example, Espo et al [9] developed the piezoelectric phononic crystal nanobeam based on the MCST for the flexure wave band structure analysis, while Estabragh and Baradaran [10] developed the finite beam model based on the MCST to investigate the large deflection of the nanobeam. Jazi [11] employed the MCST to enhance the Timoshenko beam for the nonlinear force vibration analysis of an elastically connected double nanobeam system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some experimental and theoretical research , it is shown that classical elastic theories cause many errors when they have been employed for nanosized structures. To tackle this situation, different higher-order elasticity theories such as doublet mechanics Mohamed 2020, Civalek et al 2021), couple stress (Fan et al 2020), strain gradient elasticity (Akgöz and Civalek 2011, Ansari et al 2016, Yin et al2022, Jiang et al 2022, Bagheri et al 2021, nonlocal strain gradient elasticity (Lim et al 2015, Zhou et al 2023, Xu et al 2022, Boyina et al 2022, Anh et al 2022, Norouzzadeh et al 2019, nonlocal elasticity (NE) (Vosoughi 2016, Vosoughi et al 2018, Eringen and Suhubi 1964, Eringen 1983, Eltaher et al 2023, Mohammed et al 2022, Kumar et al 2021, and modified couple stress theory (Mohtashami and Beni 2019, Asghari et al 2011, Kahrobaiyan et al 2014, Liu and Peng 2022, Zhao and He 2023, Raeisi Estabragh and Baradaran 2021, surface energy (Eltaher et al 2019, Xu andFan 2016), peridynamic model (Yang et al 2022) have been used to overcome small-size effects. Barati (2018) has studied the dynamic analysis of FG porous nanoshells with uneven and even distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the first step involves the proposal of a mathematical framework that is appropriate to describe the mechanical behavior of these systems. By contrasting the findings of the theoretical framework with experimental data, it is then possible to determine the mechanical properties of the nanostructures [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%