2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of land availability for utility-scale power plants and assessment of solar photovoltaic development in the state of Arizona, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…county-level) instead of only considering land adjacent to canals, then a comparison of ground-mounted to over-canal systems becomes most important. For instance, we assumed that existing infrastructure (such as electrical substations and power line corridors) and, in the case of ground-mounted installations, a large expanse of non-sloping (or gently sloping) vacant land 39 would be available adjacent to the selected sites. In the case of ground-mounted systems, however, difficulty with securing enough land adjacent to the canals or optimally-sited locations could result in a discrete power source remote from the use area, which would incur additional infrastructure costs and line losses 40 .…”
Section: Assumptions and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…county-level) instead of only considering land adjacent to canals, then a comparison of ground-mounted to over-canal systems becomes most important. For instance, we assumed that existing infrastructure (such as electrical substations and power line corridors) and, in the case of ground-mounted installations, a large expanse of non-sloping (or gently sloping) vacant land 39 would be available adjacent to the selected sites. In the case of ground-mounted systems, however, difficulty with securing enough land adjacent to the canals or optimally-sited locations could result in a discrete power source remote from the use area, which would incur additional infrastructure costs and line losses 40 .…”
Section: Assumptions and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Güneş enerjisi aralıklı bir kaynak olduğu için güneşlenme süresi, ortalama bağıl nem, toz fırtınası, gibi etkileri ifade eder [30][31][32]. Su buharına doymuş veya güneş almama gibi meteoroloji koşullarının güneş ışığını engellemesi ile enerji üretimi veya akış miktarı azalmaya sebep olabilir.…”
Section: Güneşlenme Süresi (Saat)unclassified
“…farklı kriterlerin en uygun kombinasyonunu gerektirmektedir. Bu sorunları çözmek için genellikle CBS tabanlı çok kriterli karar verme tekniklerinin AHP, Fuzzy, TOPSİS, ELECTRE gibi yöntemlerle birlikte kullanılarak bu süreç yönetilmektedir [8,25,27,32]. Bu yöntemlerden güneş enerji santralleri için uygun alanların değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan en yaygın yöntemler AHP ve bulanık mantıktır [29,30,51].…”
Section: Sonuçlar Ve Tartişmaunclassified
“…Si bien es posible ubicar instalaciones fotovoltaicas tanto en entornos urbanos como en zonas remotas sin infraestructura cercana, en este estudio se consideraron instalaciones que se interconecten a la red eléctrica existente para su distribución y consumo (González García, Cárdenas Galindo y Álvarez Salas, 2019). Por ello, una superficie cercana a la red vial y a la red eléctrica es primordial en la selección del emplazamiento tipo CFV, porque permite una interconexión inmediata con el sistema estatal de distribución eléctrica, sin incurrir en costos extras (Brewer et al, 2015;Majumdar y Pasqualetti, 2019). Además, se requiere garantizar la protección de la red eléctrica y de la vial dentro de un radio específico (Rodríguez Gámez, 2011), así como sus áreas destinadas a las servidumbres de paso y a los trabajos de mantenimiento y seguridad, por lo que el búfer más cercano a este sistema, sin incurrir en daños posibles, es la franja de 50 a 1 000 m.…”
Section: íNdice De Aptitud Municipalunclassified