2016
DOI: 10.15232/pas.2015-01495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of lactation feed intakes for sows including data on environmental temperatures and humidity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Shurson and Irvin (1992) found DFIs of 2.23, 3.41, 3.72, and 3.92 kg/d for Duroc sows and DFIs of 3.37, 4.83, 5.09 and 4.67 kg/d for Landrace sows from weeks 1 to 4. Cabezón et al (2016) reported mean DFI's of 5.24, 6.50, 7.12 and 7.39 kg for d 1 to 5, 6 to 11, 12 to 16 and 16 to 21 of lactation. The DFI's in this trial with genetically improved crossbred sows was substantially greater than the purebred sows of Shurson and Irwin (1992) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… Shurson and Irvin (1992) found DFIs of 2.23, 3.41, 3.72, and 3.92 kg/d for Duroc sows and DFIs of 3.37, 4.83, 5.09 and 4.67 kg/d for Landrace sows from weeks 1 to 4. Cabezón et al (2016) reported mean DFI's of 5.24, 6.50, 7.12 and 7.39 kg for d 1 to 5, 6 to 11, 12 to 16 and 16 to 21 of lactation. The DFI's in this trial with genetically improved crossbred sows was substantially greater than the purebred sows of Shurson and Irwin (1992) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of a random effect for C or K allows increased flexibility in fitting the between sow variance in the shape of the lactation curves. An alternative is to estimate the value for a random effect such as c i or k i as linear function of the random effect for DFI A or DFI 0 (dfi 0i or dfi Ai ; Cabezón et al, 2016 ). For example, the value for ki could be estimated based on its overall linear relationship with another random effect such as k i = b 1 dfi Ai or k i = b 2 dfi 0i .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Cabezón et al [11] reported an increase in feed intake when 0.3% of betaine hydrochloride (70.7% betaine) was added to diets of lactating sows, specifically in parity 2 sows. In another study, Cabezón et al [22] reported increased feed intake in parity 1 and 2 sows when betaine was supplemented at 0.3% as betaine hydrochloride, but feed intake was not affected by betaine in parity 3 to 5 or parity 6+ sows. In a metaanalysis, Sales [23] reported a mean effect side (Hedges's g) of − 0.155 (95% confidence interval was − 0.352 to 0.043) indicating a negative association of feed intake and betaine supplementation in finishing pigs; however, data showed a substantial amount of heterogeneity, indicating that responses between studies were highly variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is most probably due to the increased environmental temperatures during summer leading to a reduction in feed intake by both the gilts and sows (Bergsma & Hermesch, 2012;Cabezon et al, 2016;Koketsu, Dial, Pettigrew, & Marsh, 1996;Lewis & Bunter, 2011). Therefore, it would certainly be recommended that cooling systems (e.g., evaporative cooling systems) are introduced during gestation to help ensure the intake of necessary nutrients and energy by each female.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%