2007
DOI: 10.1002/mop.22634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of L‐strip proximity fed rectangular microstrip antenna for mobile base station

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Capacitance C is directly proportional to the area that represents the mapping of the patch on the feed line (a) and inversely proportional to the patch substrate thickness (h), such that: where ε 0 and ε r are the permittivity of free space and the relative permittivity of the patch substrate, respectively. The capacitance (C f ) can be calculated as [40]:…”
Section: Unit Cell Element Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capacitance C is directly proportional to the area that represents the mapping of the patch on the feed line (a) and inversely proportional to the patch substrate thickness (h), such that: where ε 0 and ε r are the permittivity of free space and the relative permittivity of the patch substrate, respectively. The capacitance (C f ) can be calculated as [40]:…”
Section: Unit Cell Element Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An impedance bandwidth of about 30% was typically achieved if a proper U-slot was cut in the patch [6]. The BW of CMSA (Circular Micro Strip Patch) is increased by cutting the slot at an appropriate position inside the patch and these slot cut CMSAs are optimized on substrates with thickness more than 0.09λo, the proximity feeding as well as L-probe feeding has been used [4,9,16]. For this basis, various efficient methods [5][6][7][8] were proposed to solve this problem, including the use of probe compensation [5], the U-slot [6], the L-probe feed [7], and use of the T-probe feed [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bandwidth restraint can be surmounted by differing from classic design. Introducing parasitic elements to the patch or cutting slots to diverge the surface current distribution, including the use of high-dielectric-constant substrate and cover layers [9], a short circuit [10], and a short pin [11], can get better the bandwidth further. Proximity and Aperture coupled feeds are non contacting schemes, in which electromagnetic field coupling is done to transport power among the micro strip line and the radiating patch.…”
Section: A Disadvantages Of Micro Strip Antennas (Bw/impedance Matchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Circular micro strip patch configurations are the one of most common because of their simplicity of analysis, fabrication, and their smart radiation characteristics, especially the low cross-polarization radiation which makes it good for circular polarisation (CP). The BW of CMSA is increased by cutting the slot at an appropriate position inside the patch and these slot cut CMSAs are optimized on substrates with thickness more than 0.09λo, the proximity feeding as well as L-probe feeding has been used [4,9,16]. In proximity feeding, a coupling strip is placed below the radiating patch and through the electromagnetic coupling linking patch and strip, a broadband response is realized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perturbation can be made by shorting an annular slot [11], rectangular bent slot [12]. Circularly polarization can also be achieved by designing a corner truncated square patch, a circular patch with cross slot, or micro strip fed proximity couple ring design [13][14], a single probe fed stacked micro strip antenna [15] and L-probe fed with cross slots [16]. A single fed design normally provides narrow bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%