2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(02)00544-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of kidney tumors by comparative genomic hybridization and conventional cytogenetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19][20][21][22] To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a recurrent ALK locus rearrangement in a primary kidney tumor. Although 2p23 chromosomal abnormalities have not been previously emphasized as recurrent in renal cell carcinoma, a review of the literature and search of the Mitelman database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cancerchromosomes) yielded four additional primary renal carcinomas and one renal carcinoma cell line exhibiting karyotypic aberrations at or near the ALK gene 5,[33][34][35][36] (Table 4). Notably, in contrast to cytogenetic findings in the current two cases, the earlier reported 2p23-25 rearrangements in renal tumors were accompanied by multiple numerical and structural abnormalities that are common in renal carcinomas and include deletions/rearrangements of the short arm of chromosome 3, loss of chromosome Y, and hypodiploidy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[19][20][21][22] To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a recurrent ALK locus rearrangement in a primary kidney tumor. Although 2p23 chromosomal abnormalities have not been previously emphasized as recurrent in renal cell carcinoma, a review of the literature and search of the Mitelman database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cancerchromosomes) yielded four additional primary renal carcinomas and one renal carcinoma cell line exhibiting karyotypic aberrations at or near the ALK gene 5,[33][34][35][36] (Table 4). Notably, in contrast to cytogenetic findings in the current two cases, the earlier reported 2p23-25 rearrangements in renal tumors were accompanied by multiple numerical and structural abnormalities that are common in renal carcinomas and include deletions/rearrangements of the short arm of chromosome 3, loss of chromosome Y, and hypodiploidy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Approximately 80% of all renal carcinoma cases are currently classified as clear cell, papillary, or chromophobe subtypes with discrete molecular abnormalities characteristic for each group. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Rare subtypes have also been defined by the 2004 World Health Organization classification and include collecting duct, multilocular cystic, mucinous tubular and spindle cell, medullary, and Xp11.2 translocation-and neuroblastoma-associated carcinomas; each of these subtypes constitutes B1% of all primary kidney epithelial tumors and the three latter subtypes are diagnosed predominantly in children. 8,9 Additional rare morphologic variants have been proposed; 10 however, B5% of all renal cell carcinomas do not fit into any of the currently defined categories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although molecular genetic studies of papillary adenomas are limited, comparative genomic hybridization and conventional cytogenetic karyotyping have shown that papillary adenomas have similar genetic alterations as that of PRCCs; both have in common combined trisomies of chromosomes 7 and 17 and loss of the Y chromosome [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. The important genetic difference between papillary adenomas and PRCC may be the acquisition of additional genetic alterations, specifically the addition of trisomies 12, 16, or 20 found in PRCC [33][34][35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding most likely indicates endoreduplication of chromosome 17 monosomic cells (chromophobe RCC component) and/or may alternatively represent a cell population that is tetrasomic for chromosome 7. The latter has been observed in papillary RCCs, even in the absence of the common trisomy 17 [19,21,40]. It is noteworthy that a significant number of analyzed nuclei (26%, as judged by the joint chromosome 7/17 enumeration) did not have FISH-detectable chromosomal abnormalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%