“…Some of these studies (e.g., Zakharenkova et al, 2006;Zakharenkova et al, 2008;Mubarak et al, 2009;Zhu et al, 2010;Zou and Zhao, 2010;Yao et al, 2012;Zhu et al, 2013;Xinzhi et al, 2014;Guo et al, 2015;Li et al, 2015;Pundhir et al, 2015;Alcay, 2016;Sharma et al, 2017;Akhoondzadeh et al, 2018;Sotomayor-Beltran, 2019) have confirmed the presence of ionospheric variations days before the occurrence of an earthquake. On the other hand, only a few studies (e.g., Zou, 2010;Xinzhi et al, 2014) have reported ionospheric anomalies a few days after an earthquake. Evidently, ionospheric disturbances may also arise due to some other natural phenomena or even man-made causes (Afraimovich et al, 2013); for instance, due to geomagnetic storms (Buonsanto, 1999;Danilov, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In this case, they noticed these variations by looking into changes of the shape of the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA). Generating global ionospheric disturbance maps, Xinzhi et al (2014) observed a strong positive disturbance 12 days before the earthquake in Yutian, China. They also detected 2 days after the seismic event a negative…”
An earthquake of Mw 7.1 occurred on January 14, 2018 in the southern coast of Peru. In this study, public available Global Ionospheric Maps (GIMs) provided by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) were used to look for ionospheric disturbances pre-and postearthquake. Twelve days before the seismic event, a positive anomaly was detected at low latitudes in the northern hemisphere in differential vertical total electron content maps. Moreover, given the low-latitude nature of this incident, changes in the shape of the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) were analyzed as well. A significant amplification of the northern crest in the EIA of 33.3 % was also observed 12 days before the earthquake. Because the geomagnetic and solar conditions for January 2, 2018 were very quiet and also knowing that natural ground radioactivity produced by the earthquake's preparation can increase the total electron density in the EIA, it is considered that this ionospheric disturbance is product of the earthquake's preparation. Additionally, the detection of a negative ionospheric anomaly 2 days after the incident is reported. An association to the earthquake of this negative disturbance is hinted at, due to the also the rather quiet geomagnetic and solar conditions after the seismic occurrence.
“…Some of these studies (e.g., Zakharenkova et al, 2006;Zakharenkova et al, 2008;Mubarak et al, 2009;Zhu et al, 2010;Zou and Zhao, 2010;Yao et al, 2012;Zhu et al, 2013;Xinzhi et al, 2014;Guo et al, 2015;Li et al, 2015;Pundhir et al, 2015;Alcay, 2016;Sharma et al, 2017;Akhoondzadeh et al, 2018;Sotomayor-Beltran, 2019) have confirmed the presence of ionospheric variations days before the occurrence of an earthquake. On the other hand, only a few studies (e.g., Zou, 2010;Xinzhi et al, 2014) have reported ionospheric anomalies a few days after an earthquake. Evidently, ionospheric disturbances may also arise due to some other natural phenomena or even man-made causes (Afraimovich et al, 2013); for instance, due to geomagnetic storms (Buonsanto, 1999;Danilov, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In this case, they noticed these variations by looking into changes of the shape of the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA). Generating global ionospheric disturbance maps, Xinzhi et al (2014) observed a strong positive disturbance 12 days before the earthquake in Yutian, China. They also detected 2 days after the seismic event a negative…”
An earthquake of Mw 7.1 occurred on January 14, 2018 in the southern coast of Peru. In this study, public available Global Ionospheric Maps (GIMs) provided by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) were used to look for ionospheric disturbances pre-and postearthquake. Twelve days before the seismic event, a positive anomaly was detected at low latitudes in the northern hemisphere in differential vertical total electron content maps. Moreover, given the low-latitude nature of this incident, changes in the shape of the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) were analyzed as well. A significant amplification of the northern crest in the EIA of 33.3 % was also observed 12 days before the earthquake. Because the geomagnetic and solar conditions for January 2, 2018 were very quiet and also knowing that natural ground radioactivity produced by the earthquake's preparation can increase the total electron density in the EIA, it is considered that this ionospheric disturbance is product of the earthquake's preparation. Additionally, the detection of a negative ionospheric anomaly 2 days after the incident is reported. An association to the earthquake of this negative disturbance is hinted at, due to the also the rather quiet geomagnetic and solar conditions after the seismic occurrence.
“…The search for earthquake precursors in the ionosphere is a very active field of research (e.g. Liu et al, 2004;Zakharenkova et al, 2006Zakharenkova et al, , 2008Zhao et al, 2008;Mubarak et al, 2009;Zhu et al, 2010;Zou and Zhao, 2010;Yao et al, 2012;Zhu et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2014;Xinzhi et al, 2014;Li et al, 2015;Guo et al, 2015;Pundhir et al, 2015;Alcay, 2016). There are studies that for example concentrate on a particular earthquake and through the employment of different techniques, they are able to identify ionospheric anomalies that appear a few days before and which are associated to an earthquake.…”
“…Earthquakes can be the cause of major devastations depending on their intensity. Hence in the past years, the detection of seismo-ionospheric signatures has been taking increasingly attention [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. There are different methods to detect ionospheric anomalies before a strong earthquake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the aforementioned studies [1], [3], [4], [6], [9], [8], [13], [14], [16], that have detected ionospheric disturbance prior to a strong earthquakes, have detected these disturbances for earthquakes that had their origin in the Earth's crust (depth ≤ 70 km). Only quite a few studies [19], [12], [15] have looked for seismo-ionospheric signatures in earthquakes that had their origin deeper than the crust.…”
Two major earthquakes separated by ∼5 minutes occurred in the same fault in Peru at depths of 606.2 and 620.6 km on November 24, 2015. By using Global Ionospheric Maps (GIMs) from the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) and a broadly used statistical method, differential Vertical Total Electron Content (VTEC) maps were derived. Two positive ionospheric anomalies were clearly identified in the differential VTEC maps 2 and 1 day prior to the day of the earthquakes. These anomalies were located inside the earthquakes' preparation regions defined by the Dobrovolsky equation. On the other hand, due to the low-latitude nature of the seismic events, the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) shape was also analyzed. A third positive disturbance was revealed between November 20 and 21, 2015. For the aforementioned anomaly and the one on November 22 (2 days before the earthquakes), an enhancement of the VTEC was observe through the considerable modification of the EIA shape into a well-defined double-crest with a trough. By looking into the Dst and Kp indices, the geomagnetic conditions starting on November 20 until the 24 were very quiet; thus, it is considered that the three detected anomalies are precursors to the earthquake doublet. Moreover, it is suggested that the mechanism at work that produced the positive disturbances is the air ionization through the release of radon from the Earth's crust.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.