1980
DOI: 10.2307/3575374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Ionization Distributions in a Low-Pressure Cloud Chamber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To a large extent the cloud chamber is an ideal microdosimetric device: by measuring the positions of ionising events in charged-particle tracks one can generate-with a flexibility matched only by Monte Carlo simulations-any microdosimetric quantity of interest, ranging from lineal energy spectra (in volumes of practically arbitrary shape and size) to proximity functions, that is, distributions of distances between energy transfer points in the track. Cloud-chamber data analysed in such ways have been indeed reported for a variety of radiations (Budd and Marshall 1983, Marshall er a1 1985, Budd et a1 1983, Budd and Marshall 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To a large extent the cloud chamber is an ideal microdosimetric device: by measuring the positions of ionising events in charged-particle tracks one can generate-with a flexibility matched only by Monte Carlo simulations-any microdosimetric quantity of interest, ranging from lineal energy spectra (in volumes of practically arbitrary shape and size) to proximity functions, that is, distributions of distances between energy transfer points in the track. Cloud-chamber data analysed in such ways have been indeed reported for a variety of radiations (Budd and Marshall 1983, Marshall er a1 1985, Budd et a1 1983, Budd and Marshall 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Recent publications from the Harwell grolup (Budd and Marshall 1983, Marshall et a1 1985, Budd et a1 1983, Budd and Marshall 1980) report one-dimensional root mean square diffusion distances of 4 nm and 3.5 nm in water vapour and tissueequivalent gas mixture, respectively. The spatial resolution in the proximity functions (or'interdroplet distance distributions, as they are called in these papers) is 0.5 nm in unit density (1 g water.…”
Section: Practical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 97%