2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of intervention strategies for coal miners' unsafe behaviors based on analytic network process and system dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in this work, insufficient experience is the most significant contributory factor to unsafe behaviour. Meanwhile, in [23], safety awareness is ranked as the most influencing factor of unsafe behaviors of coal miners, followed by experience. Finally, poor fitness for duty is the principal state that causes unsafe behaviours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, in this work, insufficient experience is the most significant contributory factor to unsafe behaviour. Meanwhile, in [23], safety awareness is ranked as the most influencing factor of unsafe behaviors of coal miners, followed by experience. Finally, poor fitness for duty is the principal state that causes unsafe behaviours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, the states of the worker, Adverse Mental States (AMS), Adverse Physiological States (APS), Physical/Mental Limitations (PML), and Fitness for Duty (FD), can be furtherly reflected by other more-concrete states. First, based on 163 accident investigation reports from the Fenxi Coal Mine Safety Bureau in Shanxi (the largest coal-producing province in China), we adopt six direct and indirect worker states related to unsafe behaviour, e.g., Inadequate Safety Awareness (ISA), Poor Vigilance Awareness (PVA), Insufficient Experience (IE), Insufficient Competencies (IC), Poor Situation Awareness (PSA), and Alcoholic Intoxication (AI), since most of them are proven as being the main individual factors that affect unsafe behaviors in [23]. Actually, the above six worker states are directly refined from accident investigation reports, and some example are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Structure Of the Behaviour Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When applied to the safety-related outcomes at work, COR theory can also provide some insights as to why job insecurity can induce unsafe behaviours in the context of the current research. For coal miners in China, the perceived threat of job insecurity becomes more imminent and intense (Lam, Liang, Ashford, & Lee, 2015), since their low levels of education and lack of transferable skills make it difficult for them to find alternative jobs in other industries (Yu, Cao, Xie, Qu & Zhou, 2019). Therefore, coal miners are especially anxious about maintaining their employment (Masia & Pienaar, 2011).…”
Section: The Relationship Between Job Insecurity and Unsafe Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third limitation relates to the generalisability of our research findings. Many contextual factors may influence unsafe behaviours in coal miners, such as physical environment, leadership in safety matters, safety management, and group factors (Yu, Cao, Xie, Qu, & Zhou, 2019). Future research should systematically investigate the effects of the contextual variables in our model to determine whether our findings are applicable to other contexts.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of coalmine water inrush must be rapid, accurate, and effective. Hence, it is important to improve the operating speed of the prediction model, while ensuring the prediction accuracy [21][22][23]. Bhattacharjee et al [24] developed a hybrid prediction model based on extreme learning machine (ELM) and the principal component analysis (PCA), and proved that the hybrid model is more accurate and faster than the least squares (LS) SVM and traditional BP model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%