2017
DOI: 10.24105/gjcmp.6.1.1704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Internally Generated Revenue and Infrastructural Development of Public Universities in Ondo State, Nigeria

Abstract: The government which statutorily bears the costs of public universities in the country now faces tight budget constraints, hence, the diversification of income streams is a very complex process. The study populations are the principal officers in the management and administrative cadre of the Universities in Ondo State Purposive random sampling method was used to pick the two oldest universities out of the three public Universities in Ondo State. A total number of fifty (50) management staff was used. An inven… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study revealed a significant relationship between internally generated revenue (IGR) and the cost of infrastructural development in the southeast states of Nigeria. Oyetakin & Yahaya, (2017) analyzed the relationship between internally generated revenue and infrastructural development in the public universities in Ondo state, Nigeria. The study employed primary data.…”
Section: Empirical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study revealed a significant relationship between internally generated revenue (IGR) and the cost of infrastructural development in the southeast states of Nigeria. Oyetakin & Yahaya, (2017) analyzed the relationship between internally generated revenue and infrastructural development in the public universities in Ondo state, Nigeria. The study employed primary data.…”
Section: Empirical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though some studies have examined the effects of governments’ revenue on socio‐economic and infrastructural development, they have been largely limited to individual unit level of analysis (Akpan, 2013; Edogbanya & Ja'afaru, 2013; Mbah & Onuora, 2018; Ogbu, Okezie, & Okezie, 2017; Oyetakin & Yahya, 2017) which may not give a full picture of the spatial complexities and trends of sub‐national government revenue and how it has affected socio‐economic and infrastructural development in Nigeria. On the other hand, studies that examined the relationship between government revenue and economic development across the country were limited to its effects on GDP per capita (Dang & Bako, 2015; Omodero, Ekwe, & Ihendinihu, 2018), while the nexus between government revenue and infrastructural development were left out of their study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%