2008
DOI: 10.1080/10474410701864115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Instructional Consultants' Questions and Alternatives to Questions During the Problem Identification Interview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A modest research base supports various components of the IC model, including the critical role of consultant–consultee communication in establishing collaborative relationships, and engaging in effective problem solving (see Rosenfield et al., ). For instance, Benn, Jones, and Rosenfield () found quantitative and qualitative differences between the communication skills of novice and competent instructional consultants during PID/PA, with competent consultants using more clarifying questions and higher quality verbalizations (i.e., language rated by the researchers as more collaborative, instructionally/ecologically focused, and accurate in describing problem solving stages). Research also indicates that problem conceptualizations are influenced by communicative interactions in IC and related models (e.g., Knotek, ; Knotek, Rosenfield, Gravois, & Babinski, ).…”
Section: Language Analysis In Consultationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A modest research base supports various components of the IC model, including the critical role of consultant–consultee communication in establishing collaborative relationships, and engaging in effective problem solving (see Rosenfield et al., ). For instance, Benn, Jones, and Rosenfield () found quantitative and qualitative differences between the communication skills of novice and competent instructional consultants during PID/PA, with competent consultants using more clarifying questions and higher quality verbalizations (i.e., language rated by the researchers as more collaborative, instructionally/ecologically focused, and accurate in describing problem solving stages). Research also indicates that problem conceptualizations are influenced by communicative interactions in IC and related models (e.g., Knotek, ; Knotek, Rosenfield, Gravois, & Babinski, ).…”
Section: Language Analysis In Consultationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A longitudinal investigation, over the course of multiple problem solving sessions and stages, would promote an understanding of how affect and verb tense usage are similar or different during different phases of problem solving. It would also be useful to investigate potential differences in communication with consultants at different developmental levels of competency (e.g., novice, competent, expert), expanding the limited extant research in this area (e.g., Benn et al., ); this would help us understand the development of communication skills both during training and potentially throughout the professional lifespan. In future research, systematic mixed‐methods research linking quantitative language coding with qualitative analysis is another important research endeavor; this would allow triangulation of multiple sources of data to draw conclusions about the process and outcomes of consultation.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…problem solving process strengthens consultative interactions, and is viewed positively by consultees (e.g., Babinski & Rogers, 1998;Benn et al, 2008;Etscheidt & Knesting, 2007;Knotek et al, 2003;Young & Gaughan, 2010). Structures found to be valuable across multiple studies in our sample include collaborative completion of structured forms and problem solving notes, and systematically prioritizing a single concern for problem solving.…”
Section: Consultation Structures Contribute To Coherence Enacting a mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Studies in this review indicate that rushing to intervene relates to the limited time available for consultation as well as the pressure consultants may feel to conform to an expert role (e.g., Babinski & Rogers, 1998;Henning-Stout & Bonner, 1996;Newman et al, 2014). Further, jumping to intervene relates to novice consultants' fragile knowledge of content and process (e.g., Benn, Jones, & Rosenfield, 2008;Henning-Stout, 1999;Newell & Newell, 2011;Newman, 2012). For example, premature advice giving/intervention appears to increase consultation incoherence.…”
Section: Theme 1: System-level Factors Matter For How Consultation Prmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation