1997
DOI: 10.1201/9781439821862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

23
3,996
0
66

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,147 publications
(4,085 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
23
3,996
0
66
Order By: Relevance
“…Five imputations were used, with missing data estimated from all other EF data available. All subsequent analyses were performed on each of the imputed data sets, and results for each were then averaged (Schafer, 1997). Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics for the key study variables.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five imputations were used, with missing data estimated from all other EF data available. All subsequent analyses were performed on each of the imputed data sets, and results for each were then averaged (Schafer, 1997). Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics for the key study variables.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To retain as many children as possible who met our eligibility criteria for inclusion in our analyses (i.e., at least age 7 by the time of the 2000 assessment), we used MI (Baer, Kivlahan, Blume, McKnight, & Marlatt, 2001;Rubin, 1987;Schafer, 1997). MI replaces missing values with predictions based on all the other information observed in the study.…”
Section: Missing Data and Multiple Imputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two acceptable methods of handling missing data for ITT analyses are the full information maximum likelihood method (FIML); (Little and Rubin, 1987), and multiple imputation (Rubin, 1987(Rubin, , 1996Schafer, 1997;Schafer and Graham, 2002). FIML estimates are computed by maximizing the likelihood based on the variables observed for each case, assuming that the data are missing at random (Rubin, 1976), sometimes averaging over covariates that predict missingness (Baker et al, 2006).…”
Section: Handling Missing Data In Itt Analyses In Multilevel Rfts-mismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple imputation forms a set of complete datasets based on an imputation model, then uses an analytic model to assess intervention effects on each of the completed datasets. The imputation model used to replace the missing data should always be at least as complex as the analytic model used to examine intervention impact (Collins et al, 2001;Graham et al, 2006Graham et al, , 2007Schafer, 1997Schafer, , 1999Schafer and Graham, 2002).…”
Section: Handling Missing Data In Itt Analyses In Multilevel Rfts-mismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation