2000
DOI: 10.1006/viro.2000.0506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of in Vitro Activities of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 UL42 Mutant Proteins: Correlation with in Vivo Function

Abstract: The DNA polymerase (pol) catalytic subunit of herpes simplex virus type 1, encoded by UL30, and its accessory factor, UL42 protein, are both essential for the replication of the virus. Because the stable interaction between UL42 and pol renders the pol fully processive for replicative DNA synthesis, disruption of this interaction represents a potential goal in the development of novel antiviral compounds. To better compare the effects of mutations in UL42 protein on its known in vitro functions, mutations were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the Pol/UL42 holoenzyme activity was relatively resistant to changes in ionic strength over KCl concentrations ranging from 50 to 125 mM. Similar salt resistance was observed for Pol/UL42 holoenzyme reconstituted from the individual subunits (39).…”
Section: Detection Of Binding To P/t By Nitrocellulose Filter Assayssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, the Pol/UL42 holoenzyme activity was relatively resistant to changes in ionic strength over KCl concentrations ranging from 50 to 125 mM. Similar salt resistance was observed for Pol/UL42 holoenzyme reconstituted from the individual subunits (39).…”
Section: Detection Of Binding To P/t By Nitrocellulose Filter Assayssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…6). Control experiments demonstrated that BSA at concentrations as high as 600 nM failed to bind to surfaces containing the model P/T at a level significantly higher than to non-DNA-containing surfaces (39).…”
Section: Vol 76 2002mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we do not understand why such a large fraction of the R182A protein in crude extracts was active, these observations illustrate the necessity of first removing inactive protein prior to assaying the binding of UL42 proteins to DNA or to other proteins, including Pol. This issue may be relevant to a report of poor correlations between the effects of mutations on certain in vitro activities of mutant UL42 proteins and their effects in infected cells (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43,44 A priori, therefore, one might have expected a gradual increase in processivity as the amount of DNA with which UL42 can interact increases. However, each mutation reduced UL42 binding much more than they reduced the processivity of the UL30-UL42 complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%