2020
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2020.3024229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of LC-Resonance in DC SQUID Using Dynamic System Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the I-V curves differ from those corresponding to the RSJ (Resistively Shunted Junction) model and there is an undamped resonance corresponding to a voltage of about 70 μV. As expected from the theoretical simulations [ 44 , 45 ], this is due to a high β C value, despite the presence of the damping resistor. However, as can be seen from the I-V characteristics, the resonance is quite far from the working point of the sensor and therefore does not create any problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the I-V curves differ from those corresponding to the RSJ (Resistively Shunted Junction) model and there is an undamped resonance corresponding to a voltage of about 70 μV. As expected from the theoretical simulations [ 44 , 45 ], this is due to a high β C value, despite the presence of the damping resistor. However, as can be seen from the I-V characteristics, the resonance is quite far from the working point of the sensor and therefore does not create any problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Note that the I-V curves differ from those corresponding to the RSJ (Resistively Shunted Junction) model and there is an undamped resonance corresponding to a voltage of about 70 µV. As expected from the theoretical simulations[44,45], this is due to a high β C value, despite the presence of the damping…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%