2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2022.100338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of hydrogen-powered propulsion system alternatives for diesel-electric regional trains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs), on the other hand, are more efficient than any other type of FC but operate at higher temperatures between 600-1000 °C. The disadvantages of the fuel cells are the use of expensive metal catalysts, which drives up the cost of these products, and the poisoning effect of platinum catalysts [9]. The scientific community continues to search for cheaper alternative catalysts for fuel cells that can replace platinum, which is expensive.…”
Section: Fuel Cell Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs), on the other hand, are more efficient than any other type of FC but operate at higher temperatures between 600-1000 °C. The disadvantages of the fuel cells are the use of expensive metal catalysts, which drives up the cost of these products, and the poisoning effect of platinum catalysts [9]. The scientific community continues to search for cheaper alternative catalysts for fuel cells that can replace platinum, which is expensive.…”
Section: Fuel Cell Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their many advantages over other FC types, including their relatively quick startup and shutdown times, PEMFCs are generally the most widely used FC technology. The use of expensive metal catalysts drives up the cost of these products, and the poisoning effect of platinum catalysts is one of their main disadvantages [9]. The AFC is another low-temperature FC technology that is less expensive than PEMFCs, but because of its sensitivity to CO 2 molecules, it performs significantly more poorly than PEMFCs [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations