2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of human immune responses in quasi-experimental settings: tutorial in biostatistics

Abstract: BackgroundHuman immunology is a growing field of research in which experimental, clinical, and analytical methods of many life science disciplines are utilized. Classic epidemiological study designs, including observational longitudinal birth cohort studies, offer strong potential for gaining new knowledge and insights into immune response to pathogens in humans. However, rigorous discussion of methodological issues related to designs and statistical analysis that are appropriate for longitudinal studies is la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
131
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We were guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol (30), although we developed and documented the review using the Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research (ENTREQ) statement (31, see supplementary file 1). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol (30), although we developed and documented the review using the Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research (ENTREQ) statement (31, see supplementary file 1). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed PRISMA guidance [21] and completed the ENTREQ checklist for qualitative systematic reviews [22] (Supplementary File 1 and 2). Our study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42015017248).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, principles of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) framework for data retrieval were adapted for this metasynthesis study (i.e., identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion). Additionally, the 21-item Enhancing Transparency in Reporting The Synthesis of Qualitative Research [ENTREQ] statement (Tong, Flemming, McInnes, Oliver, & Craig, 2012) was also utilized to report the common stages we undertook in the synthesis of these qualitative health reports. Finally, to ensure that a thorough search with maximum specificity was conducted, the validated McMaster Qualitative Filter was used (Letts et al, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%