2014
DOI: 10.1166/jmihi.2014.1239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Human Hand Kinematics: Forearm Pronation and Supination

Abstract: One of the important movements to be trained on stroke patients during rehabilitation exercises is forearm pronation and supination as this movement is critical for activities of daily living. We conducted a kinematic study on healthy subject to investigate the effect of elbow and shoulder position on the Range of Motion of forearm pronation and supination. The Range of Motion was measured using a specially designed haptic knob on 40 healthy subjects (28 men and 12 women). Measurements were taken with three el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two females and 22 males participated in the experimental trials. Based on data from a previous study that measured the range of motion and velocity of forearm supination, females supinated their left and right forearms 6-8 per cent faster than males, and therfore the results may not have accurately reflected biomechanical differences between males and females (Rahman et al, 2014). Because the the inclusion of more female participants may decrease the median time to perform supinations, and consequently the total time to steer from a lognitudinal trajectory to the turning circle may also decrease, it was expected that the median lateral error of the sEMG-based HMI would decrease, if not remain approximately the same.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two females and 22 males participated in the experimental trials. Based on data from a previous study that measured the range of motion and velocity of forearm supination, females supinated their left and right forearms 6-8 per cent faster than males, and therfore the results may not have accurately reflected biomechanical differences between males and females (Rahman et al, 2014). Because the the inclusion of more female participants may decrease the median time to perform supinations, and consequently the total time to steer from a lognitudinal trajectory to the turning circle may also decrease, it was expected that the median lateral error of the sEMG-based HMI would decrease, if not remain approximately the same.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To summarize, the robotic device needed to be suitable for decentralized usage, motivational, easy to set up, portable, affordable and compact as listed in that Table I. Forearm and wrist training are targeted in this project is because these two are the important movements for human activities daily living [9]. The range of movement and stiffness for each joint is identified and listed in Table II [10], [11], before the robot development.…”
Section: System Requirementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study developed by [13] and later revisited by [14] evaluated that most of the activities of daily living (ADL's) can be performed with a range of motion between -50 o and 50 o measured from the neutral position. Also, studies from [15,16] show that the angular velocities reach maximum values at 400 o /s (7 rad/s) within eating and drinking tasks. These ranges for the ADL`s are extremely important, while for the lower limb the range of motion and velocity analysis usually focus on the gait, for the upper limb a huge variety of different movements must be analyzed.…”
Section: Biomechanics Of the Forearmmentioning
confidence: 99%