2020
DOI: 10.1104/pp.20.00141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Global Methylome and Gene Expression during Carbon Reserve Mobilization in Stems under Soil Drying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Promoters of DPT-encoding genes did indeed contain fewer TF binding sites (median of 5 instead of the of 6 regulatory elements for GPTs, P <0.0001; Supplementary Figure 8A, Supplementary Table 15), and TATA-boxes (23.4% vs. 25.7%, P =0.002; Supplementary Figure 8A, Supplementary Table 15), and DPTs were longer than GPTs (1.19× difference, P =1.99×10 -41 ; Figure 3, Supplementary Table 7), all in agreement with a housekeeping role. Furthermore, gbM levels were higher for the less abundant DPTs than for the more abundant GPTs (1.25× difference, P =8.12×10 -11 ; Figure 3), matching previous observations on gbM and gene expression for field-grown rice (Wang et al, 2020). All of these patterns were similar overall for Japonica (Supplementary Figures 3 and 8B, Supplementary Tables 8 and 15).…”
Section: Main Textsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Promoters of DPT-encoding genes did indeed contain fewer TF binding sites (median of 5 instead of the of 6 regulatory elements for GPTs, P <0.0001; Supplementary Figure 8A, Supplementary Table 15), and TATA-boxes (23.4% vs. 25.7%, P =0.002; Supplementary Figure 8A, Supplementary Table 15), and DPTs were longer than GPTs (1.19× difference, P =1.99×10 -41 ; Figure 3, Supplementary Table 7), all in agreement with a housekeeping role. Furthermore, gbM levels were higher for the less abundant DPTs than for the more abundant GPTs (1.25× difference, P =8.12×10 -11 ; Figure 3), matching previous observations on gbM and gene expression for field-grown rice (Wang et al, 2020). All of these patterns were similar overall for Japonica (Supplementary Figures 3 and 8B, Supplementary Tables 8 and 15).…”
Section: Main Textsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Then, the above constructed vectors were mixed well for the transient expression assay in the rice protoplasts. This transient expression assay was performed as described previously (Wang et al 2019a , b ; Wang et al 2020 ). The primers used were listed in Additional file 2 : Table S5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, antagonism between DNA methyltransferase and demethylase affects the dynamic DNA methylation changes. For instance, drought induces DNA methylation levels in rice, but gene expression of methyltransferase and demethylase were both increased (Wang et al, 2020a). In this study, it is shown that the expression of some DNA methyltransferases and demethylase could enhance DNA methylation in specific contexts, and inhibit the methylation levels in others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The regulation patterns varied from different plants between DNA methyltransferase and demethylase. During the fruit development, the expression of demethylase and DNA methylation level showed an opposite trend in orange and tomato (Huang et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2020a). The expression of DNA methyltransferase and demethylase could only affect methylation levels in specific contexts in some plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%