2009
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200900306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of genetic variation in Globocephaloides populations from macropodid marsupials using a mutation scanning‐based approach

Abstract: Three species of Globocephaloides, parasitic nematodes occurring in macropodid marsupials in different areas of Australia, were characterized by the sequences of the first and second internal transcribed spacers (ITS-1 and ITS-2) of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Samples were subjected to PCR-coupled SSCP analysis and targeted sequencing, in order to assess genetic variation within and among individuals from different host species. Both SSCP and sequence data supported the current classification of morphospecies. Cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, these studies also show whether, and if so, how, populations within these cryptic species are geographically structured. For example, geographical structuring of genetic diversity was not seen in populations of Globocephaloides trifidospicularis [ 26 ], nor in several species within the Hypodontus macropi complex [ 27 ], nor in Rugopharynx australis from Macropus robustus and M. rufus [ 28 ], nor in several Capillaria species [ 29 ], but was observed in populations of H. macropi from subspecies of Macropus robustus , H. macropi from subspecies of Macropus rufogriseus [ 27 ] and Labiosimplex australis from M. rufogriseus [ 30 ]. In some cases, studies have failed to detect any genetic variation within parasitic nematode species at all, such as in H. macropi from Petrogale persephone [ 27 ], Globocephaloides affinis from Macropus dorsalis [ 26 ], and several other Cloacina species [ 31 ], but this may be due to the very low numbers of hosts and parasites studied (Table 2 ).…”
Section: Parasitic Nematodes Of Wild Terrestrial Vertebratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some cases, these studies also show whether, and if so, how, populations within these cryptic species are geographically structured. For example, geographical structuring of genetic diversity was not seen in populations of Globocephaloides trifidospicularis [ 26 ], nor in several species within the Hypodontus macropi complex [ 27 ], nor in Rugopharynx australis from Macropus robustus and M. rufus [ 28 ], nor in several Capillaria species [ 29 ], but was observed in populations of H. macropi from subspecies of Macropus robustus , H. macropi from subspecies of Macropus rufogriseus [ 27 ] and Labiosimplex australis from M. rufogriseus [ 30 ]. In some cases, studies have failed to detect any genetic variation within parasitic nematode species at all, such as in H. macropi from Petrogale persephone [ 27 ], Globocephaloides affinis from Macropus dorsalis [ 26 ], and several other Cloacina species [ 31 ], but this may be due to the very low numbers of hosts and parasites studied (Table 2 ).…”
Section: Parasitic Nematodes Of Wild Terrestrial Vertebratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One taxon in P. persephone , the other in all other host species. [ 31 ] Globocephaloides macropodis 4 Macropus dorsalis ; 1 M. agilis ITS1 and ITS2 G. macropodis from each host species had fixed differences at 5.2% and 7.1% of nucleotides in ITS1 and ITS2, respectively [ 26 ] …”
Section: Parasitic Nematodes Of Wild Terrestrial Vertebratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent molecular study, Fazenda et al (2009) analyzed the genetic variation in populations of Globocephaloides using single-stranded conformation polymorphism followed by targeted sequencing, and determined that there was consistent and significant difference in the sequences of the internal transcribed spacers of the nuclear ribosomal DNA (5% and 7% for ITS-1 and ITS-2, respectively) between G. macropodis derived from M. dorsalis and M. agilis (compared with no variation among individual worms from each host species). In the present study, the posterior and anterior ends of male and female specimens (AHC 45367) from G. macropodis used for molecular study (Fazenda et al 2009) were examined in detail by light microscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the posterior and anterior ends of male and female specimens (AHC 45367) from G. macropodis used for molecular study (Fazenda et al 2009) were examined in detail by light microscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation