Abstract:Mangrove is an ecosystem subjected to tide, salinity and nutrient variations. These conditions are stressful to most plants, except to mangrove plants that are well-adapted. However, many mangrove areas have extremely stressful conditions, such as salt marshes, and the plants nearby usually present morphological alterations. In Sepetiba Bay, two species of mangrove plants, Avicennia schaueriana and Laguncularia racemosa, have poor development near a salt marsh (SM) compared to plants at the riverside (RS), whi… Show more
“…Lira‐Medeiros et al () reported epigenetic differences in morphologically contrasting populations (1.9–7.5 m) of Laguncularia racemosa. Also, genetic differences using AFLP markers were reported among salt marsh and riverside A. schaueriana (Lira‐Medeiros, Cardoso, Fernandes, & Gomes‐Ferreira, ). Nevertheless, to date, no studies have considered the physiognomic type of R. mangle mangrove, environmental variables, or ecological characteristics of our study.…”
The environmental variability at local scale results in different physiognomic types of mangrove forest. However, this variability has never been considered in studies of mangrove genetic variability. This study analyzed the genetic and morphological variability and structure of Rhizophora mangle at regional and local scales in the Yucatan Peninsula. Thirteen mangrove populations (eight scrub and five tall), located in seven sites, were sampled, and their morphological variability and relationship with the availability of phosphorus and salinity were analyzed. The diversity and genetic structure were estimated at different hierarchical levels with nine microsatellites, also Bayesian inference and Principal Coordinates Analysis were used. We found a great morphological variability of R. mangle that responded to local environmental variability and not to the precipitation gradient of the peninsula. The genetic diversity found in the peninsula was greater than that reported for other populations in Mexico and was grouped into two regions: the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. At a local scale, tall and scrub mangroves had significant genetic differentiation suggesting that ecological barriers promote genetic differentiation within sites. These results need to be considered in future population genetic studies and for mangrove management and conservation.
“…Lira‐Medeiros et al () reported epigenetic differences in morphologically contrasting populations (1.9–7.5 m) of Laguncularia racemosa. Also, genetic differences using AFLP markers were reported among salt marsh and riverside A. schaueriana (Lira‐Medeiros, Cardoso, Fernandes, & Gomes‐Ferreira, ). Nevertheless, to date, no studies have considered the physiognomic type of R. mangle mangrove, environmental variables, or ecological characteristics of our study.…”
The environmental variability at local scale results in different physiognomic types of mangrove forest. However, this variability has never been considered in studies of mangrove genetic variability. This study analyzed the genetic and morphological variability and structure of Rhizophora mangle at regional and local scales in the Yucatan Peninsula. Thirteen mangrove populations (eight scrub and five tall), located in seven sites, were sampled, and their morphological variability and relationship with the availability of phosphorus and salinity were analyzed. The diversity and genetic structure were estimated at different hierarchical levels with nine microsatellites, also Bayesian inference and Principal Coordinates Analysis were used. We found a great morphological variability of R. mangle that responded to local environmental variability and not to the precipitation gradient of the peninsula. The genetic diversity found in the peninsula was greater than that reported for other populations in Mexico and was grouped into two regions: the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. At a local scale, tall and scrub mangroves had significant genetic differentiation suggesting that ecological barriers promote genetic differentiation within sites. These results need to be considered in future population genetic studies and for mangrove management and conservation.
“…The dataset was cleaned by excluding loci with high amounts of missing data. The binary matrix created was used in Hickory v-1.1 [42], which is a Bayesian method that calculates deviation of the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium by the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), so it does not calculate using allele frequency (details in [41]). The Bayesian differentiation index, θ ST , was calculated with the f -free model: 250,000 runs and 50,000 burn-ins in the Hickory software.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA extraction followed the protocol of Lira-Medeiros et al [41]. After the extraction, the samples were checked and quantified using 1% agarose gel and Nanodrop TM 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), then diluted into 12.5 ng/µL.…”
Section: Dna Isolation and Pcr Amplificationmentioning
Vital for many marine and terrestrial species, and several other environmental services, such as carbon sink areas, the mangrove ecosystem is highly threatened due to the proximity of large urban centers and climate change. The forced fragmentation of this ecosystem affects the genetic diversity distribution among natural populations. Moreover, while restoration efforts have increased, few studies have analyzed how recently-planted areas impact the original mangrove genetic diversity. We analyzed the genetic diversity of two mangroves species (Laguncularia racemosa and Avicennia schaueriana) in three areas in Brazil, using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Using the local approach, we identified the genetic diversity pool of a restored area compared to nearby areas, including the remnant plants inside the restored area, one well-conserved population at the shore of Guanabara Bay, and one impacted population in Araçá Bay. The results for L. racemosa showed that the introduced population has lost genetic diversity by drift, but remnant plants with high genetic diversity or incoming propagules could help improve overall genetic diversity. Avicennia schaueriana showed similar genetic diversity, indicating an efficient gene flow. The principal component analysis showing different connections between both species indicate differences in gene flow and dispersal efficiencies, highlighting the needed for further studies. Our results emphasize that genetic diversity knowledge and monitoring associated with restoration actions can help avoid bottlenecks and other pitfalls, especially for the mangrove ecosystem.
“…Morphological markers are limited in number; their expression is often influenced by environment fluctuation, and many of them are not closely linked with economic traits and even have adverse effects on the development and growth of plants. However, morphological markers have been used for diversity analysis in various plant species (Lira-Medeiros et al 2015).…”
Soybean is an economically important leguminous crop. Genetic improvements of soybeans have focused on enhancement of seed and oil yield, development of varieties suited to different cropping systems, and breeding resistant/tolerant varieties for various biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant breeders have used conventional breeding techniques for the improvement of these traits in soybean. The conventional breeding process can be greatly accelerated through the application of molecular and genomic approaches. Molecular markers have proved to be a new tool in soybean breeding by enhancing selection efficiency in a rapid and time-bound manner. An overview of molecular approaches for the genetic improvement of soybean seed quality parameters, considering recent applications of marker-assisted selection and 'omics' research, is provided in this article.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.