2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of gene expression profiles under water stress in tolerant and sensitive sugarcane plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
91
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
10
91
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Results demonstrated stem reserve mobilization of sucrose at a higher level in ICSV213 compared to ICSB338 under stress as evident from the difference in brix and hexose levels between these varieties. These observations were previously made in soybean, pigeon pea and sugarcane mature culms under water stress (Lawlor and Cornic, 2002;Liu et al, 2004;Rodrigues et al, 2009 andIskandar et al, 2011). The higher levels of fructose produced in stressed plants in both varieties was an indicator that fructans were possibly the main storage carbohydrates remobilized to fructose under stress with suggestive roles in osmoregulation (Pilon-Smits et al, 1999;Livingston III et al, 2009;Gaudet et al, 2011 ;Van den Ende and El-Esawe, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Results demonstrated stem reserve mobilization of sucrose at a higher level in ICSV213 compared to ICSB338 under stress as evident from the difference in brix and hexose levels between these varieties. These observations were previously made in soybean, pigeon pea and sugarcane mature culms under water stress (Lawlor and Cornic, 2002;Liu et al, 2004;Rodrigues et al, 2009 andIskandar et al, 2011). The higher levels of fructose produced in stressed plants in both varieties was an indicator that fructans were possibly the main storage carbohydrates remobilized to fructose under stress with suggestive roles in osmoregulation (Pilon-Smits et al, 1999;Livingston III et al, 2009;Gaudet et al, 2011 ;Van den Ende and El-Esawe, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Aditionally, low NPQ has been reported to provide protection against photo-oxidative damage (Müller et al 2001;Omasa and Takayama 2003). In a recent study, a reduction in F v / F m and Φ PSII in some sugarcane cultivars was observed, and it resulted in reduced P n (Rodrigues et al 2009;da Silva et al 2012). Previously, P n has been demonstrated to be a very sensitive parameter for the classification of sugarcane germplasm for drought tolerance (de Silva and de Costa 2009; da ) and it has been found to hold good in the present study and useful in screening the sugarcane cultivars for drought tolerance.…”
Section: Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthetic Capacitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Plants that survive or maintain their growth rate in periods of water deficit are considered as tolerant (Rodrigues et al, 2009). When these changes occur, the root system is the first region in a plant to detect and signal the effects of stress to other cells, tissues, and organs (Sauter et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%