2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of gas jetting and fumarole acoustics at Aso Volcano, Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note here that these results may also be interpreted as an indication that nonlinear effects are insignificant for Sakurajima acoustic signals and that consequently the linear propagation assumption is reasonable for estimating source parameters such as volume and mass flux (e.g., Fee et al, ; Johnson & Miller, ; Kim et al, ) or gas exit velocity (e.g., Matoza et al, ; McKee et al, ; Woulff & McGetchin, ). However, the potential significance of nonlinear effects at Sakurajima is evidenced by observations of supersonic wave propagation (Ishihara, ; Yokoo & Ishihara, ) asymmetric pressure waveforms (e.g., Matoza et al, ), and acoustically based source parameters that underestimate (Johnson & Miller, ) or overestimate (Fee et al, ) values obtained by other methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…We note here that these results may also be interpreted as an indication that nonlinear effects are insignificant for Sakurajima acoustic signals and that consequently the linear propagation assumption is reasonable for estimating source parameters such as volume and mass flux (e.g., Fee et al, ; Johnson & Miller, ; Kim et al, ) or gas exit velocity (e.g., Matoza et al, ; McKee et al, ; Woulff & McGetchin, ). However, the potential significance of nonlinear effects at Sakurajima is evidenced by observations of supersonic wave propagation (Ishihara, ; Yokoo & Ishihara, ) asymmetric pressure waveforms (e.g., Matoza et al, ), and acoustically based source parameters that underestimate (Johnson & Miller, ) or overestimate (Fee et al, ) values obtained by other methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Using an infrasound sensor elevated from the Earth's surface yields an unprecedented view of the acoustic wavefield from volcanic explosions, an idea proposed by Matoza et al (). We use a tethered aerostat to achieve the vertical sensor coverage, but some studies such as McKee et al () and Rowell et al () have used nearby topography for an improvement in vertical station coverage for a network around a volcano. Including the aerostat sensor in the inversions yielded a measurable increase in dipole strength that would have otherwise been unobservable, and shows the importance of both the vertical sensor coverage and multipole inversion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson et al () solved for a subvertical dipole orientation where sensors located on the crater rim were above the crater floor. Studies such as McKee et al () and Rowell et al () have taken advantage of surrounding topography for network deployments at Aso and Karymsky volcanoes, respectively, in order to improve vertical coverage of infrasound sensors; however, not all volcanoes have the advantage of nearby high relief topography. This study, for the first time, incorporates the vertical dipole component using acoustic data collected on a tethered aerostat, which has great flexibility for sensor location and may sample closer to a hypothetical vertical dipole axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eruption directivity, where the energy and mass may be preferentially discharged from the conduit, has important hazardous consequences prompting public interest and research. Several examples of such directivity effects have been documented from visual (Lube et al, ), seismic (Kanamori & Given, ), infrasound (Jolly et al, ; McKee et al, ; Rowell et al, ), and GPS observations (Fournier & Jolly, ). Observed features of infrasonic records include seismoacoustic energy coupling and wave conversion (e.g., Johnson & Aster ; Ichihara et al, ), excitations from secondary source features such as jet turbulence (e.g., Matoza et al, ; Rowell et al, ), or distorted frequencies that may be ascribed to Doppler effects (Jolly et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%