2015
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/90/12/125301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of fusion dynamics of colliding systems involving stable, loosely bound and halo nuclei

Abstract: This article analyzed the fusion dynamics of stable nuclei, loosely bound nuclei and halo nuclei within the view of coupled channel approach and the energy dependent Woods-Saxon potential model (EDWSP model). The different projectiles ( Li

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of range parameter used in the EDWSP model calculations are consistent with the commonly adopted values of the range parameter (r 0 = 0.90fm to r 0 = 1.35fm) used in literature within the context of the different theoretical methods for different fusing systems [1,2,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. In the present analysis, the values of the range parameter extracted for the 4 9 Be + 39 89 Y, Y reactions are also consistent with our previous analysis [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][43][44][45][46][47].…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The values of range parameter used in the EDWSP model calculations are consistent with the commonly adopted values of the range parameter (r 0 = 0.90fm to r 0 = 1.35fm) used in literature within the context of the different theoretical methods for different fusing systems [1,2,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. In the present analysis, the values of the range parameter extracted for the 4 9 Be + 39 89 Y, Y reactions are also consistent with our previous analysis [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][43][44][45][46][47].…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…In other words, the extrafusion enhancement at sub-barrier energies forthe 17 O+ 144 Sm reactionover the 16 O+ 144 Sm reactionis a consequenceof the cumulative influence of inelastic surface excitationsand one neutronchannel with a positive Q-value. The coupled channel investigations due to Leigh et al [67], Morton et al [72], and Gautam [75], drawn the similar conclusions about the fusion enhancement of 16,17 O+ 144 Sm systems. Inthe fusion of 16 O+ 148 Sm system, the shape ofparticipantsis considered to be spherical, and couplings to low lying quantum states such as + 2 and -3 vibrational states play an important role in the enhancing of fusion cross-sectionsat lower barrier energies than the 1-DBPM predictions as evident from figure 5(c).…”
Section: Fusion Ofmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In case of 144,148 Sm-nuclei, the vibrational degrees of freedom of the targets were turned out to be dominant while for 152,154 Sm-nuclei, the rotational states of targets were found to be very important and played a crucial role in the fusion dynamics of these isotopes with different projectiles. In this sense, the fusion dynamics of 16 O with 144,148,154 Sm and 17 O with 144 Sm reactions are very interesting and exciting [67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79]. In literature, the fusion dynamics of 16 O+ 144 Sm reaction was found to be highly sensitive to the cumulative impacts of inelastic surface quantum states, whereas the fusion of 17 O+ 144 Sm reaction reflected the superiority of cumulative effects of inelastic surface excitations as well as the positive Q-value neutron transfer channel [65,79,80].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been recognized that the fusion mechanism of tightly bound nuclei in the close vicinity of the Coulomb barrier is strongly influenced by the intrinsic structure degrees of freedom of the colliding pairs [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. For stable nuclei, the coupling of the relative motion of the colliding nuclei to their nuclear structure degrees of freedom, like collective surface vibrational states (spherical nuclei), rotational states (deformed nuclei), nucleon (multi-nucleon) transfer channels etc., eliminates the discrepancies between experimental fusion data and the expectations of the one-dimensional barrier penetration model [8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, in the fusion of colliding systems involving weakly bound nuclei (or halo nuclei), the breakup channel sig-nificantly affects the fusion process in the close vicinity of the Coulomb barrier [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%