2007
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/007872-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of functional domains present in the N-terminus of the SipB protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Central or C-terminal regions of T3S substrates were also shown to contribute to the secretion of the effector protein SipB from Salmonella spp. and the translocon protein EspB from enterohemorrhagic E. coli (93,271). As an alternative to the amino acid-based T3S signal, a signal in the corresponding mRNAs of several effector proteins from Yersinia was proposed, suggesting a cotranslational secretion of these proteins (16,17).…”
Section: Recognition Of Secreted Proteins T3s Signals Are Not Conservmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central or C-terminal regions of T3S substrates were also shown to contribute to the secretion of the effector protein SipB from Salmonella spp. and the translocon protein EspB from enterohemorrhagic E. coli (93,271). As an alternative to the amino acid-based T3S signal, a signal in the corresponding mRNAs of several effector proteins from Yersinia was proposed, suggesting a cotranslational secretion of these proteins (16,17).…”
Section: Recognition Of Secreted Proteins T3s Signals Are Not Conservmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most effector proteins have one N-terminal secretion signal, other substrate classes appear to have additional export signals: the Yersinia ruler protein features a central stretch that is also required for export [183], and translocators as well as some effectors were shown to require both N-and C-terminal signals [184][185][186].…”
Section: Export Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three methods agreed in categorizing 10 of the effectors, including InvJ and SipB, as sequence order dependent. These effectors are both SOD members and have small, well-defined sequences that are necessary for secretion (31,63), indicating that they are indeed sequence order dependent. Additionally, we have generated two randomly scrambled variants of the SseJ secretion signal that were predicted with high (SseJ-H) and low (SseJ-L) SIEVE scores (8).…”
Section: Is the Type III Secretion Signal Dependent On Order Of Aminomentioning
confidence: 99%