2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of forest naturalness and tree mortality patterns in Estonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
38
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its importance, deadwood is now at a critically low level in many temperate forests, mainly due to inappropriate management practices. Recently, deadwood has become more considered as an indicator in the assessment of naturalness of forest ecosystems (Larson et al 2001;Kristensen 2003;Schuck et al 2004;Laarmann et al 2009) a source of nutrients in natural forest (Beets et al 2008) and an important component in both carbon sequestration and cycling (Teodosiu and Bouriaud 2012). The amounts of deadwood in natural forests depend on many factors such as geographical location and forest management (Stevenson and Jull 2006;Yan et al 2007;Woodall and Liknes 2008), and its correct estimation must consider forest type (species composition and stand structure), developmental stages, type and frequency of natural disturbance, type of management, but also soil and climatic characteristics, which together contribute to complete the formation and decomposition cycle of deadwood (Christensen et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its importance, deadwood is now at a critically low level in many temperate forests, mainly due to inappropriate management practices. Recently, deadwood has become more considered as an indicator in the assessment of naturalness of forest ecosystems (Larson et al 2001;Kristensen 2003;Schuck et al 2004;Laarmann et al 2009) a source of nutrients in natural forest (Beets et al 2008) and an important component in both carbon sequestration and cycling (Teodosiu and Bouriaud 2012). The amounts of deadwood in natural forests depend on many factors such as geographical location and forest management (Stevenson and Jull 2006;Yan et al 2007;Woodall and Liknes 2008), and its correct estimation must consider forest type (species composition and stand structure), developmental stages, type and frequency of natural disturbance, type of management, but also soil and climatic characteristics, which together contribute to complete the formation and decomposition cycle of deadwood (Christensen et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of animal habitat, a diversity of dead tree conditions helps ensure a diversity of organisms including fungi, bryophytes, lichens, invertebrates, amphibians, cavity nesting birds, and small mammals (Bobiec et al 2005). In the temperate European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forests, the death of individuals or small groups of trees is the primary natural disturbance that provides for a continuous presence of dead tree of different sizes and decay status (Laarmann et al 2009). Forest fragmentation has imposed additional difficulties for dispersal of dead tree dependent forest organisms between remaining old-growth stands (Edman et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [28] showed that growth loss will significantly increase, even when only a small percentage of roots are infected by root pathogens. The study by Laarmann et al [23] found that the probability of trees dying due to diseases in Estonia is higher in trees with a larger relative diameter at breast height. Our study showed that in both species the diameter of damaged trees was relatively larger than the average diameter of all drilled trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger the mean index, the more neighbouring trees are decayed and the higher is the clumping of decayed trees. To evaluate the clumping of decayed neighbouring trees, the decay mingling index-which is based on the deadwood mingling index [23] and the species mingling index [24]-was used. We calculated the decay mingling index of a reference tree with decay (Equation 1) to assess the proportion of the n nearest neighbours j of a reference tree i:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%