2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.12.034026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Field-Effect Passivation in Textured and Undiffused Silicon Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[33][34][35] And this surface field effect has been modeled to explain the low recombination rate of surface photocarriers, highlighting the importance of the surface electric field on photocarrier extraction. [36,37] We comparatively illustrate the mechanisms playing in two types of devices-"far-field" and "near-field" in the Supporting Information (Figure S8, Supporting Information). It is the confluence of a variety of factors that results in the near-ideal quantum efficiency of the nanostalagmite b-Si device.…”
Section: Optoelectronic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35] And this surface field effect has been modeled to explain the low recombination rate of surface photocarriers, highlighting the importance of the surface electric field on photocarrier extraction. [36,37] We comparatively illustrate the mechanisms playing in two types of devices-"far-field" and "near-field" in the Supporting Information (Figure S8, Supporting Information). It is the confluence of a variety of factors that results in the near-ideal quantum efficiency of the nanostalagmite b-Si device.…”
Section: Optoelectronic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that it is unlikely that the corona charges can be deposited uniformly on a b-Si surface, which might, at least partly, explain this empirical result [14]. Using 2-D numerical simulations, Turkay et al [15] found that the surface nanofeatures would affect the field-effect passivation and that there could be a field-effect passivation enhancement for lightly doped c-Si under low-injection condition when Q f magnitude is moderate (5 × 10 8 cm −2 < |Q f | < 3 × 10 11 cm −2 for accumulation conditions and 3 × 10 10 cm −2 < |Q f | < 3 × 10 11 cm −2 for inversion conditions). Although these studies have shed some light on the nature of surface passivation of nanofeatures, the detailed mechanism of field-effect passivation on b-Si and its dependence on the nanofeature morphology should be systematically investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%