2010
DOI: 10.1002/sia.3260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Fe nanoparticles using XPS measurements under d.c. or pulsed‐voltage bias

Abstract: The impact of solution exposure on the charging properties of oxide coatings on Fe metal-core oxide-shell nanoparticles has been examined by sample biasing during XPS measurements. The Fe nanoparticles were suspended in relatively unreactive acetone and analyzed after particles containing solutions were deposited on SiO2/Si or Au substrates. The particle and substrate combinations were subjected to ±10V d.c. or ±5V a.c., biasing in the form of square wave (SQW) pulses. The samples experienced variable degrees … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 23.4% C concentration indicated for the pristine DE is due to the surface contamination of adventitious carbon. 35 The atomic concentration of carbon increases from 23.4% to 26.7% and concentration of silicon from 17.4% to 19% corresponds to the introduction of the carbon chain with siliane froups from the MPTMS modification on the diatom surface. 36 The increase in atomic concentration of sulfur from 0 to 3.1% in the MPTMS-DE sample indicates a successful -SH surface functionalization.…”
Section: Characterization Of Pristine and Chemicallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 23.4% C concentration indicated for the pristine DE is due to the surface contamination of adventitious carbon. 35 The atomic concentration of carbon increases from 23.4% to 26.7% and concentration of silicon from 17.4% to 19% corresponds to the introduction of the carbon chain with siliane froups from the MPTMS modification on the diatom surface. 36 The increase in atomic concentration of sulfur from 0 to 3.1% in the MPTMS-DE sample indicates a successful -SH surface functionalization.…”
Section: Characterization Of Pristine and Chemicallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect results in spectral shifts toward higher binding energies and is prominent in nonconductive samples or parts of surface heterostructures. In a sample of uniform composition, the shift can easily be compensated for by using an appropriate reference, but layered and otherwise heterogeneous materials will experience differential charging which cannot be corrected for in a simple manner. While the problem can be partially resolved using an electron flood gun, complete neutralization of the surface is difficult as attempts to replenish electrons can cause the buildup of negative charge or nonuniform charging of the sample. When varied in a controlled manner, differential charging can be used to derive chemical and/or physical parameters of composite samples. This approach, pioneered by Suzer and co-workers, has been effectively but not widely used to examine differential charging and the dynamics of charge transfer in complex composite samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%