2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7253-1_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Extracellular Vesicles Using Fluorescence Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Abstract: Fluorescence nanoparticle tracking analysis (fl-NTA) allows for accurate sizing, counting, and phenotyping of extracellular vesicles (EV). Here, we present two protocols for the analysis of EVs using fl-NTA, highlighting the potential pitfalls and challenges. The first protocol utilizes CellMask Orange™ (CMO) as a general membrane marker to label EVs derived from plasma. The second protocol describes the use of a Qdot-conjugated antibody to identify syncytiotrophoblast (STB)-derived EVs. "Standard" preparation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particle counting by light scatter, RPS, and similar techniques typically results in overestimation of EV counts since the techniques are not specific to EVs and also register co-isolated particles including lipoproteins and protein aggregates. Possibly, ongoing development of fluorescence capabilities of NTA devices may ultimately allow EV-specific measurement [181], although assay sensitivity and the tendency of labeling antibodies and lipid dyes to form particles pose substantial hurdles to such applications [127,182]. Additionally, particle counting technologies may be biased towards certain particle size ranges (especially 50-150 nm [183,184]) because of pore sizes (RPS), size of calibrator used, sensitivity (for example, smaller particles scatter less light), and ability to cope with multidispersity (DLS versus NTA) [185].…”
Section: ) Intermediate Recovery Intermediate Specificity: Methods mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle counting by light scatter, RPS, and similar techniques typically results in overestimation of EV counts since the techniques are not specific to EVs and also register co-isolated particles including lipoproteins and protein aggregates. Possibly, ongoing development of fluorescence capabilities of NTA devices may ultimately allow EV-specific measurement [181], although assay sensitivity and the tendency of labeling antibodies and lipid dyes to form particles pose substantial hurdles to such applications [127,182]. Additionally, particle counting technologies may be biased towards certain particle size ranges (especially 50-150 nm [183,184]) because of pore sizes (RPS), size of calibrator used, sensitivity (for example, smaller particles scatter less light), and ability to cope with multidispersity (DLS versus NTA) [185].…”
Section: ) Intermediate Recovery Intermediate Specificity: Methods mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twelve randomly selected samples from the three different batches were sent to an independent laboratory, Extracellular Vesicle Core at Children's Hospital Los Angeles (California, USA), and were analyzed by nanoparticle tracking analysis for the presence of particles in the extracellular vesicle size range using Malvern Panalytical Nanosight NS300. These samples were also analyzed after staining with a general fluorescent membrane marker, CellMask Orange™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), as previously described [19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent report, Ko et al developed a magnetic nanopore sorting platform that has been used to isolate specific cancer-derived EVs. They EVs expressing a given marker [65]. Despite better size resolution of NTA, a great advantage of FCM is its higher multiplexing capacity.…”
Section: Technologies For Evs Isolation and Analysis And Recent Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%