2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.11.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of explosives using corona discharge ionization combined with ion mobility spectrometry–mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the enrichment achieved by the extraction, LOD and LOQ for the real water sample were 0.42 and 1.4 nmol/L. These values are higher than that of GC with solid-phase extraction (100 times of enrichment), LOD of 0.04 g/L (∼0.18 nmol/L) [7], comparable with HPLC (LODs 0.35-0.54 g/L, 1.5-2.4 nmol/L; LOQs 1.17-1.80 g/L, 5-8 nmol/L) [8], electrochemical method (LOD of 1.5 nmol/L) [10], mass spectrometry (LOD of 0.1 g/L, ∼0.44 nmol/L) [15]. But because of the simple operation and instrumentation, the proposed method is advantageous over these conventional techniques, especially for on-site analyses.…”
Section: Determination Of Tnt In Real Samplesmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the enrichment achieved by the extraction, LOD and LOQ for the real water sample were 0.42 and 1.4 nmol/L. These values are higher than that of GC with solid-phase extraction (100 times of enrichment), LOD of 0.04 g/L (∼0.18 nmol/L) [7], comparable with HPLC (LODs 0.35-0.54 g/L, 1.5-2.4 nmol/L; LOQs 1.17-1.80 g/L, 5-8 nmol/L) [8], electrochemical method (LOD of 1.5 nmol/L) [10], mass spectrometry (LOD of 0.1 g/L, ∼0.44 nmol/L) [15]. But because of the simple operation and instrumentation, the proposed method is advantageous over these conventional techniques, especially for on-site analyses.…”
Section: Determination Of Tnt In Real Samplesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Therefore, fast and reliable detection of trace TNT has attracted considerable attentions [5]. Various analytical techniques, including gas chromatography [6,7], high performance liquid chromatography [8,9], voltammetry [10,11], ion mobility spectrometry [12,13], mass spectrometry [14,15], energy dispersive X-ray diffraction [16,17], surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy [18,19], and surface plasmon resonance [20][21][22], just name a few, have been applied in the detection of trace amounts of TNT. These techniques are all effective, but the requirement of complicated analytical instruments, lengthy and tedious operation procedures of these methods exclude their application in on-site analysis, especially in emergencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al analyzed five commonly used explosives (RDX, HMX, TNT, DNT, and PETN) by using ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry (IMS-MS) [129] RDX·NO 3 − , TNT − , PETN·NO 3 − , HMX·NO 3 − , and DNT − were detected and the average drift times were 6.93 ms, 10.20 ms, 9.15 ms, 12.24 ms, 11.30 ms, and 8.89 ms, respectively. The detection limits were 0.1 ng for RDX, 10 ng for TNT, 0.5 ng for PETN, 5.0 ng for HMX, and 10 ng for DNT.…”
Section: Ion Mobility Spectroscopy (Ims)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LODs ranged between 0.1 ng for RDX and 10 ng for DNT, thus demonstrating its potential for trace analysis. [51] Consequently, the use of MS or its coupling to separation techniques provides an improved sensitivity and confirmation of the molecules detected, at the expense of more expensive and complex equipment and limitations regarding the portable formats compared to CE.…”
Section: Comparison Of Ce With Other Emerging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%