2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00015-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of ERS wind scatterometer time series over Sahel (Mali)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for previous studies based on ERS scatterometer data [5], soil roughness is assumed constant over the year at the considered spatial scale (3 × 3 km 2 ). Consequently, observed temporal variations of σ 0 are interpreted in terms of SSM and vegetation-cover variations.…”
Section: Temporal Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for previous studies based on ERS scatterometer data [5], soil roughness is assumed constant over the year at the considered spatial scale (3 × 3 km 2 ). Consequently, observed temporal variations of σ 0 are interpreted in terms of SSM and vegetation-cover variations.…”
Section: Temporal Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential of spaceborne C-band scatterometers for observing semiarid areas originates from their high sensitivity to the drastic changes of surface dielectric properties between the successive dry and wet seasons, including the amount of green vegetation and the top-soil moisture content [4], [8], [9]. Observations made at large incidence angles were found in to be good agreement with vegetation cover, whereas low incidence angle acquisitions were related to the variation of soil-moisture content [5], [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As the frequency decreases, C-band and Ku-band capture more backscattering from leaf and twigs (leaf biomass) of the upper canopy of tropical forests (Toan et al 1992, Waring et al 1995. Past research has found that for sparse vegetation regions, such as grasslands and savannas, C-band and Ku-band backscattering observations require careful interpretation because soil moisture can modulate the signal (Jarlan et al 2002). By contrast, in tropical evergreen forests, with closed canopies, C-band and Ku-band backscattering are more strongly related to leaf biomass dynamics, with limited contribution from soil moisture (Frolking et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general trends of the radar response as a function of soil conditions and the sensor characteristics (frequency, incidence, polarisation) are well captured by backscatter models (e.g. Jarlan et al, 2002), but the operational applicability of inversion schemes is still challenging since the parameters required for modelling are difficult to estimate over large areas and since the relative contribution of these parameters on the signal is difficult to decouple.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%