Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate left ventricular contractility and energetic cost of cardiac ejection under conditions of acute increase in aortic compliance. Methods: In six anaesthetized pigs, ascending aortic compliance was increased by adding a volume chamber in parallel to the ascending aorta. Systemic vascular parameters, including characteristic impedance, peripheral resistance, total vascular compliance, and inertance, were estimated with a four-element windkessel model. Arterial elastance was derived from these parameters. Left ventricular systolic function was assessed by end-systolic pressure±volume relationship (end-systolic elastance), and stroke work. Pressure±volume area was used as a measure of myocardial oxygen consumption. Heart rate remained constant during the experimentation. Results: Adding the aortic volume chamber signi®cantly increased vascular compliance from 0.95^0.08 to 1.17^0.06 ml/ mmHg (P , 0:01), while inductance, characteristic impedance, peripheral resistance, and arterial elastance remained statistically at basal values, respectively 0.0020^0.0003 mmHg.s 2 /ml, 0.105^0.009 mmHg.s/ml, 1.27^0.12 mmHg.s/ml, and 2.43^0.21 mmHg/ml. During the same interval, stroke work and pressure±volume area decreased respectively from 2700^242 to 2256^75 mmHg.ml (P , 0:01), and from 3806^427 to 3179^167 mmHg.ml (P , 0:01). Stroke work and pressure±volume area decreased at matched end-diastolic volumes. In contrast, end-systolic elastance, ejection fraction, and stroke volume remained statistically unchanged, respectively at 2.29^0.14 mmHg/ ml, 48.1^2.1 %, and 32.4^1.7 ml. Conclusions: These data suggest that, when facing an increased aortic compliance, the left ventricle displays unchanged contractility, but the energetic cost of cardiac ejection is signi®cantly decreased. These data may be of clinical importance when choosing an arti®cial prosthesis for ascending aortic replacement. q