2022
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1031967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of endometrial lavage microbiota reveals an increased relative abundance of the plastic-degrading bacteria Bacillus pseudofirmus and Stenotrophomonas rhizophila in women with endometrial cancer/endometrial hyperplasia

Abstract: The pathogenic influences of uterine bacteria on endometrial carcinogenesis remain unclear. The aim of this pilot study was to compare the microbiota composition of endometrial lavage samples obtained from women with either endometrial hyperplasia (EH) or endometrial cancer (EC) versus those with benign uterine conditions. We hypothesized that specific microbiota signatures would distinguish between the two groups, possibly leading to the identification of bacterial species associated with endometrial tumorige… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chao et al. reported a higher abundance of Rhodococcus in the uterine lavage fluid samples of patients with endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer than in those with benign endometrial lesions, suggesting a potential association with abnormal endometrial proliferation ( Chao et al., 2022 ). Similarly, Lu et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chao et al. reported a higher abundance of Rhodococcus in the uterine lavage fluid samples of patients with endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer than in those with benign endometrial lesions, suggesting a potential association with abnormal endometrial proliferation ( Chao et al., 2022 ). Similarly, Lu et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their phenotypic and genotypic diversity, the taxonomic status of the genus Stenotrophomonas and S. maltophilia has changed several times. Besides the species in the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex (SMc), S. maltophilia ( Chang et al., 2015 ; Patil et al., 2018 ; Bansal et al., 2021 ; Brooke, 2021 ) and S. sepilia ( Gautam et al., 2021 ), only S. pavanii ( Iebba et al., 2018 ), S. acidaminiphila ( Ježek et al., 2020 ; Zhang et al., 2022 ) and S. rhizophila ( Chao et al., 2022 ) have been isolated from human samples. The clinically important species S. africana ( Coenye et al., 2004 ) is classified as a synonym of S. maltophilia , whereas S. pavanii has been removed from SMc ( Rouf et al., 2011 ; Patil et al., 2018 ; Maturana and Cardenas, 2021 ; Deng et al., 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%