2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2006.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of electrostatic MEMS using meshless local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkable successes of the MLPG method have been reported in solving the convection-diffusion problems; fracture mechanics; Navier-Stokes flows; and plate bending problems. Recently, the MLPG method has made some strides, and it is applied successfully in studying strain gradient materials [Tang, Shen and Atluri, (2003)), three dimensional elasticity problems ], and elstodynamics [Batra, Ching (2002)]. The MLPG method was also extended to solve the boundary integral equations , and Han, Atluri (2003)].…”
Section: The Meshless Local Petrov-galerkin (Mlpg) Methods and Radial mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remarkable successes of the MLPG method have been reported in solving the convection-diffusion problems; fracture mechanics; Navier-Stokes flows; and plate bending problems. Recently, the MLPG method has made some strides, and it is applied successfully in studying strain gradient materials [Tang, Shen and Atluri, (2003)), three dimensional elasticity problems ], and elstodynamics [Batra, Ching (2002)]. The MLPG method was also extended to solve the boundary integral equations , and Han, Atluri (2003)].…”
Section: The Meshless Local Petrov-galerkin (Mlpg) Methods and Radial mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MLPG method, a truly meshless method developed by Atluri and his colleagues, is a simple and lesscostly alternative to the FEM and BEM , Atluri and Shen (2002a, b)]. Remarkable successes of the MLPG method have been reported in solving the convection-diffusion problems [Lin and Atluri (2000)]; beam problems [Raju, Phillips (2003)]; fracture mechanics [Kim & Atluri (2000), Ching & Batra (2001)]; strain gradient materials [Tang, Shen and Atluri, (2003)]; three dimensional elasticity problems ]; elstodynamic problems [Batra, Ching (2002);]; elastodynamic problems in continuously nonhomogeneous solids [Sladek, Sladek, Zhang (2003)]; thermoelasticity ]; Navier-Stokes flows ]; and plate bending problems , Long and Atluri (2002), Qian, Batra, and Chen (2003a, b)]. A comparison study of the efficiency and accuracy of a variety of meshless trial and test functions is presented in Atluri and Shen (2002a, b), based on the general concept of the meshless local PetrovGalerkin (MLPG) method.…”
Section: Multi-scale Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both forces are increased by raising voltage until the applied voltage is touched to a critical value, in which the diaphragm collapses on the fixed electrode which means pull-in happens (Batra et al, 2008). The critical voltage associated with this instability is called pull-in voltage (Batra et al, 2006). In some cases, delaying the onset of pull-in instability would be extremely desirable as it is considered as a limiting factor of the functional range of capacitive microphone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It offers a lot of flexibility to deal with large deformation problems. Remarkable successes of the MLPG method have been reported in solving the potential problems, the convection-diffusion problems and the nonlinear boundary value problems by Atluri et al [13][14][15]; the fracture mechanics problems by Kim and Atluri [16]; the NavierStokes flows by Lin and Atluri [17]; the elasticity problems and plate bending problems by Long [18,19]; static and free vibration analysis of thin plates by Gu and Liu [20]; Crack Tip Fields problems by Ching and Batra [21,22]; anisotropic elasticity problems and crack analysis in 3-D axisymmetric FGM bodies by Sladek et al [23,24]. However, there exist some inconveniences in the MLPG method when the shape functions are obtained from interpolation schemes, such as the Moving Least Squares method (MLS), Partition of Unity Method (PUM), Reproducing Kernel Particle Method (RKPM), or Shepard function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%