Analysis of Effects of Agriculture Intervention Using Propensity Score Matching

Abstract

Nowadays, the agriculture extension programmes are practiced in many parts of the world. There is a mixture of results about the effects of agriculture intervention programmes. The literature shows that the interventions are ineffective and have limited diffusion. On the other side, it shows that interventions are effective. Following different arguments about the effects of agriculture extension, this paper adopted Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to analyze the effects of District Agricultural Sector Investment Project (DASIP) using agriculture data.The study was conducted in rural Tanzania areas. It covered five regions namely Kagera, Mwanza, Mara, Simiyu and Kigoma. The study focused on agro-ecological zone where corn is cultivated. Two methods which are questionnaire administration and direct oral interview were used to collect primary data. The collection of data using the questionnaire was done from both participants (359) and non-participants (519). Before running the independent t test, the estimation of propensity score was done using Logistic regression. Thirteen confounding variables were used to estimate propensity scores. ISSN 2166-0379 2015 www.macrothink.org/jas Journal of Agricultural Studies 50The effects of the intervention were analysed by considering four items namely the earnings from corn production, value of livestock owned, value of household assets owned, and value of farm assets owned. The results show that none of the four factors had significant result as the p values are greater than 0.05. This implies that the earning between farmers participating in DASIP are not significant different from those who do not participate in the programme. The study recommends that the group activities should last longer rather than changing them from time to time.

Impact of Extension Services Provided by ATMA (Agricultural Technology Management Agency) on Small and Marginal Farmers in Rural Assam

“…Interna onal studies have generally e v a l u a t e d e x t e n s i o n s y s t e m a n d methodology and have found mixed results (Dercon et al, 2009 ;Davis et al, 2012;Hunt et al, 2014;Läpple and Hennessy 2015;Josephat andRose, 2015 Cawley et al, 2018;Teka and Lee, 2019).…”