Analysis of Effectiveness and Psychological Techniques Implemented in mHealth Solutions for Middle-Aged and Elderly Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review of the Literature

Abstract

Background: in diabetes, multiple mHealth solutions were produced and implemented for self-management behaviors. However, little research on the effectiveness of psychological techniques implemented within these mHealth solutions was carried out, and even less with the elderly population where technological barriers might exist. Reliable evidence generated through a comprehensive evaluation of mHealth interventions may accelerate its growth for successful long-term implementation and to help to experience mHealth benefits in an enhanced way in all ages. Objective: this study aimed to review mHealth solutions for diabetes self-management in older adults (adherence to treatments and glycemic control) by analyzing the effectiveness of specific psychological techniques implemented. Methods: a narrative review was conducted following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed (Medline) and American Psychological Association (APA) PsycInfo databases were searched for published papers that addressed eHealth solutions’ effectiveness for diabetes self-management. Studies in English, Spanish, and/or German of any design were screened, with no time constraints regarding the year of publication. A qualitative analysis of the selected papers was conducted in several steps. Results: this review found 38 studies setting up and analyzing mHealth solutions for older adults. Most research showed improvements in HbA1c, self-management behaviors, and medication adherence in T2DM patients post intervention. However, different mid-to-long term effects were found across studies, specifically concerning the maintenance and adherence to healthy behaviors. The most employed psychological framework was CBT, including techniques such as self-monitoring of outcome behaviors (mostly targeting glycemia measurements and healthy habits as physical activity and/or diet), tailored motivational feedback from medical staff, and psychoeducation or health coaches. The most successful mHealth intervention combined the feature of tailored feedback messages, interactive communication with healthcare professionals, and multifaceted functions. Conclusions: there is a lack of elaborate and detailed information in the literature regarding the factors considered in the design and development of mHealth solutions used as interventions for T2DM self-management in the elderly. Documentation and inclusion of such vital information will foster a transparent and shared decision-making process that will ultimately lead to the development of useful and user-friendly self-management apps that can enhance the quality of life for diabetes patients. Further research adapting mHealth solutions to older adults’ sensory deficits is necessary.

Cognitive Profile and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment

“…These methods include stress management, relaxation techniques, self-monitoring of behavioral outcomes, problem-solving, cognitive restructuring, planning, goal-setting, modeling, selfefficacy, psychoeducation, and specific dietary and exercise recommendations. Additionally, new technologies like mHealth strategies, grounded in CB theories, have proven to be efficient in managing T2D in older adults [53]. New approaches rooted in well-established psychological theories are imperative, especially since the presence of CVRFs often correlates with mental disorders, potentially having multiplicative effects [54].…”

Improving the management of type 2 diabetes in China using a multifaceted digital health intervention in primary health care: the SMARTDiabetes cluster randomised controlled trial

“…Its core features drew on existing evidence from almost exclusively high-income country settings and included tailored feedback from PHC providers through app or interactive communication, reminder functions, self-monitoring of outcomes, and other multifaceted functions. 13 , 24 , 27 , 28 , 29 We provided free access to the digital intervention and aligned it with the requirements of the national BPHS package. The novelty of SMARTDiabetes is that it tested an implementation strategy which strengthened existing elements of the primary health care system.…”

Introducing the Pi-CON Methodology to Overcome Usability Deficits during Remote Patient Monitoring

“…In addition to considering how physical characteristics may negatively impact the way patients interact with PGHD devices, designing technology for patients with psychiatric disabilities or conditions, such as anxiety disorders, depression, or autism spectrum disorders is necessary [22]. Rodríguez-Fernández et al report that around 13 million adults in the US may be challenged to adopt a Telehealth service due to difficulties [23], and Vázquez-de Sebastián et al add that a patient's sensory limitations may hinder the use in mobile health technologies [24]. What can cause this lack of adherence is that these devices may not have been designed with these users in mind.…”