2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-5054-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of dysphagia in advanced-stage head-and-neck cancer patients: impact on quality of life and development of a preventive swallowing treatment

Abstract: 1b and 2b.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
56
1
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
56
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Carmignani et al found better post-therapy swallowing function in patients with hypopharynx or larynx cancer as compared to oral cavity and OPC. 49 The current study was not able to show any difference in dysphagia determined by the tumor site. Increasing T classification, on the other hand, seemed to correlate with dysphagia severity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Carmignani et al found better post-therapy swallowing function in patients with hypopharynx or larynx cancer as compared to oral cavity and OPC. 49 The current study was not able to show any difference in dysphagia determined by the tumor site. Increasing T classification, on the other hand, seemed to correlate with dysphagia severity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Dysphagia is an important cause of malnutrition, dehydration, weight loss, chronic aspiration and aspiration pneumonia. All these complications can lead to not only serious health issues and even death, but may also result in depression and social isolation 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15. In addition, late dysphagia, even of a mild grade, is one of the most important factors adversely influencing quality of life of HNC patients, with feeding-tube dependency having the most negative impact 9…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-one of these studies were prospective studies [ 14 – 34 ] and eight were retrospective [ 35 42 ]. The sample sizes ranged from twelve [ 30 ] to 497 participants [ 42 ]. The majority of the sample sizes were small, with 18 studies including 60 or fewer participants [ 15 25 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 33 35 , 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies were based on patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) therapy. Six studies [ 22 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 33 , 34 ] included surgical patients; however, the prehabilitation program appeared to be implemented preRT/CRT, not pre-surgery. Three studies [ 28 , 37 , 39 ] did not specify if surgical patients were included.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%