2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-014-0602-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of dynamic vehicle loads using vehicle pavement interaction model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, dynamic pressure amplitude decreases dramatically with the increase of depth. This conclusion is consistent with the results of Park et al [30], Xia et al [31], and Feng et al [32]. Table 4 also demonstrates that the greatest attenuation ratio of dynamic pressure is 87% as depth increases from 0.19 m to 3.12 m. The dynamic pressure amplitudes are between 30 kPa and 50 kPa on the top of the up-embankment and are between 10 kPa and 20 kPa when the depth is 3.12 m.…”
Section: Effect Of Truck Loadingsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, dynamic pressure amplitude decreases dramatically with the increase of depth. This conclusion is consistent with the results of Park et al [30], Xia et al [31], and Feng et al [32]. Table 4 also demonstrates that the greatest attenuation ratio of dynamic pressure is 87% as depth increases from 0.19 m to 3.12 m. The dynamic pressure amplitudes are between 30 kPa and 50 kPa on the top of the up-embankment and are between 10 kPa and 20 kPa when the depth is 3.12 m.…”
Section: Effect Of Truck Loadingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The dynamic pressure amplitudes of measuring points in up-embankment and subembankment increase with the increase of truck speed. Park et al [30], Xia et al [31], and Feng et al [32] also found that dynamic pressure exhibited an increasing tendency with increasing truck speed. The possible reason is that high frequency vibrations are absorbed by soil and the vibrations with low frequency become the dominant vibrations gradually as the truck loading transfers from top to bottom.…”
Section: Effect Of Truck Loadingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The other methodology is the decoupling method, which constructs the vehicle and pavement models separately, obtains the vehicle dynamic loads induced by road surface roughness, and then investigates the pavement dynamic response under vehicle loads. In the vehicle-pavement coupling method, the road surface roughness is usually simplified as a harmonic wave function because of the complexity of the model [1][2][3]. In the vehicle-pavement decoupling method, the vehicle load is simplified either as a harmonic load or as a moving constant load [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the road testing, the average driving speed of the vehicle is 45 km/h, the road roughness coefficient S 0 = 2×10 -6 m, taking the dynamic load factor is 2.1 [31], calculates the dynamic load of the ME-Wheel as 36,015 N. The detailed calculation results are shown in Table 1. When the ME-Wheel is cornering, the force of the vehicle is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Fig 11 Pin Force Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%