2008
DOI: 10.1061/jhtrcq.0000250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Dynamic Response of Deck Pavement for Large-span Steel Bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the values of the surface roughness of bridge deck pavement x g were simulated by the MATLAB software according to (5). en, (1) was solved, the values of additional load F d were obtained according to (3), and the values of dynamic load F t were obtained according to (2).…”
Section: Computing Model and Simulation Of Dynamic Load Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, the values of the surface roughness of bridge deck pavement x g were simulated by the MATLAB software according to (5). en, (1) was solved, the values of additional load F d were obtained according to (3), and the values of dynamic load F t were obtained according to (2).…”
Section: Computing Model and Simulation Of Dynamic Load Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, surface roughness of the pavement has a significant influence on driving comfort and driving safety [3]. Many researchers [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] had studied the response of road and bridge deck pavement under the action of dead loads, moving constant loads, and dynamic loads, and dynamic loads have been considered to be a better way to reflect surface roughness of road and bridge deck pavement. White noise filtering method, harmony superposition method, FFT method, and AR/ARMA method are four common types of models to produce surface roughness of road and bridge deck pavement, in which harmony superposition method and FFT method [12,13] are considered to be simple, highly accurate in computation, and based on rigorous mathematical foundation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asphalt concrete paved on steel bridge was usually considered to be elastic material by many researchers [3,4] , and adjacent layers of deck pavement were also considered to be completely continuous with each other [3][4][5] . This situation denotes as ECCS model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%